Hey Sarah,
Bear with me a bit longer of you will. I like to be thorough and make sure nothing is hiding! Hope that's OK?
all good!
therefore keeping "me" in a endless chasing loop.
Are thoughts the enemy? Is there a need to stop them?
Honestly yes, thought were seen as the enemy, in a sense that there was the assumption that when the thoughts stop appearing, all is done.
After yesterday, I am even more confused. What seemed so real, appears to be not permanent now. Not sure if it was just an impression or a real experience anymore, because thoughts are still going on now.
I just want to look at sensory experience and separation, start with seeing.
Gaze at an object. Turn up that inner magnifying glass to observe what's happening in direct experience. In seeing, what is being experienced? What is happening when "seeing" is happening? What is doing the seeing? What is being seen? What does "seeing" consists of? Describe the actual, direct experience of seeing. Do you first perceive the object using some other sense, and then see it later? Can you find a dividing line between the object and the seeing of it? Or are the object and the seeing of it inseparable? Is there an entity called "you" experiencing the seeing? Can you find a dividing line between "you" and seeing? Is it an accurate description of direct experience? Are there really three entities there in direct experience, an "I" and seer and an object? Or is there only seeing? What do you see about the thought, "I'm seeing that object"?
ok here we go.
When "seeing" is happening, the eye is seeing the object. if I close my eyes, the object disappears. However, the object is just a name or a label applied to a bunch of colors. So all the eye is seeing is colors (which are, in a sense, also a label).
I couldn't find a dividing line between the object and the seeing of it. Seeing can't exist by itself without the object and object without the seeing of it (in direct experience), so they are connected, all being one and the same thing, with different names. However, it all seems to appear still to an I that claims all this as the seer.
Regarding the statement, it's rather "I am seeing" that is true in my case.
Try it with various sights e.g. out of the window at a distant view. See if you can find a way to separate the object from the seeing and the seeing from the seer. Where does one start and the other end? How many senses are there here - 1 or more?
Tried it and all seems the same as before. No way to separate the seeing from the object, neither from the seer.
When I tried to look at a tree in a distance and at the same time think of an orange, I had a vivid image of the orange, but at the same time the tree was also seen. So the seer was occupied with the orange, but the tree was still noticed.
Best,
Dani