Re: Looking for guidance please
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:49 pm
Hi.
No rush!
And ask if you are unsure.
Nettie
No rush!
And ask if you are unsure.
Nettie
Liberation Unleashed Forum The Gate
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/
https://liberationunleashed.com:443/nation/viewtopic.php?t=2713
No. There is no separate entity / Ian thing that has shape or form that thinks, or talks or writes etc. Nothing has disappeared (no entity that was there before but isn't now) so it never was. The idea of an 'I' with substance was just that - an idea or assumption. Looking for an I that has shape or form or substance brings it home clearly that it doesn't exist.1)Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?
It is an assumption - basically a thought that has never been questioned. There are experiences (perceptions, sensations, thoughts) in awareness and the mind labels these. So there is thinking & there is an associated thought that says 'I am thinking'. Same with all activities - there is driving & there is an assumption 'I am driving'. The key thing I've found is to look for the 'I' that is doing these things in each situation - so during walking to check if there is an entity doing walking or whether walking is just happening. It turns out that there is no such entity doing the walking! & when this is seen it is quite clear. The mind loves spinning stories though & it is in the habit of telling stories centred on the 'I' & what's happening in my life & what might happen, etc. But looking for that 'I' brings home that it's just a mythical thing - the non-existent subject of an up and down story. If it is believed the self is real then it seems to need constant minding, propping up, protecting, enhancing, developing and so on. If it's not there (& actually looking for it has made the difference here) then it doesn't need anything! Which is a bit of a relief really.2)Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.
It's not earth-shattering or anything really - everyday life goes on but there is a feeling of freedom that goes with the 'looking & not finding a self' thing. Yesterday there was a wonderful feeling of peace all day but feelings come & go & today it's back to work & all that goes with that but that's okay.3)How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.
That's the absolute key - actually looking. My experience for a while had been of there being 'seeing' but no 'see-er' (visually that is) & hearing but no hearer but for some reason there was still an assumption that there was a thinker behind thinking, a walker behind walking, an author behind writing & so on. Actually looking for that entity in the present (i.e. when walking, thinking, writing was going on) reveals the absence of that entity / do-er & that makes it all so much simpler.4)What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?
What has stuck with me is there is just experience (& experience = awareness + perceptions + sensations + thoughts passing through). Within experience there can be a story about a 'controller', intentions, an entity who chooses & tries to control experience, but such an entity can't be found when looked for. There are just thoughts, perceptions, sensations inseparable from awareness. So there is just experience really with no separate experiencer.5)Do you decide, intend, choose, control events in Life? Do you make anything happen? Give examples from your experience.
There has been a shift. Things feel fresh & new somehow. There will probably be a need to keep checking or looking to find a separate self / Ian entity at different times if the mind continues to tell the story of an entity that acts, chooses, experiences etc. Perhaps it is like walking out of the cinema after being immersed in a film for a few hours - emotions generated by the film linger, & the characters still seem to have some reality but you know it was just a film really & that these things will fade.6)Anything to add?
okay, some examples from today re intending, controlling, choosing, deciding;Do you decide, intend, choose, control events in Life? Do you make anything happen? Give examples from your experience.
No, no 'me' who can actually break up, divide, change or be outside of what is. There is not an I either inside or outside - only the thought of an I that acts and changes and observes things from outside.So thought is composed of learned shared words....and it seems to divide the timeless flow into 'bits' that includes a separate you. And this all happens effortlessly....and is there a you who can step outside of this all-encompassing un-compounded unicity to change or re-arrange or add to or subtract any other part less part?
Apparently so!So does life simply spontaneously naturally effortlessly happen all by itself?
Not considered this before, but perceptions don't seem to have any distinct boundaries to them. There is also a sense that they aren't actually things with substance - that when sought there isn't much to them at all.Can you put a knife blade inbetween two perceptions?
Can you put two isolated perceptions side by side and compare them?
If there is really no isolating or comparing them than how could there actually be a better or worse?
And if there is no isolating separate events, how could there be cause and effect?
There is a little bit of resistance to knowing there is only 'what is' ('life simply happening') & that there are no grounds for the distinctions self / other, me / you, etc. Feels like there is a subtle fear of being totally immersed in something & thus lost for good! But as there is nothing there to be lost or immersed, just 'what is' then that can only be a fear generated or imagined by the mind. Never been aware of it before though. Hey ho!And if there is no chooser or decider...life simply happening...
That would include all of it. There would be no-one who could stand outside of the seamless timeless flow of perception we call life?
A subtle sense of control in life - but only a sense, no real control would be lost.What would be lost for good?
There is no me (other than as a thought) or entity that does or chooses, and there is no thinker of thoughts. But stuff is done, choices are made, thoughts are thought…So look again.. Is there a do-er?
A thinker?
A chooser?
Anything stable or solid or fixed?
No, not that I'm aware of. Maybe there will be some searching type behaviour in the future but there doesn't seem to be much desire for any sort of search now, or any sense of incompleteness. What is is what is - not very profound but without a 'central character' then experience / life flows on complete in itself not needing anything (or anyone) to make it whole or complete (actually, quite the opposite - it needs an idea of an 'I' or self to make it seem incomplete or deficient or in need of changing).Does it feel like you are still searching? Like something is missing?
There is seeing but no one doing the seeing, thinking but no thinker, hearing but no hearer, talking but no talker. So thoughts happening, music playing, sensations felt, decisions being made, words being typed - nothing special really, but all arising within an empty awareness rather than happening to an imagined individual.So describe in particular life right now without a controller.
Decider or thinker.
No!do 'others' have a self but you don't?
The same place where thoughts, things, sensations, etc are experienced - within empty, impersonal awareness.Where do you experience 'others'?
In direct experience, no. The mind tells a story of separate others with separate selves but they are only stories.In direct experience do others have control?