How do you know that what is being seen, heard, touched etc. is what you call “others”?In DE there are 'others' - I can see, hear, touch, and smell 'others'
That it is not simply life life-ing or what-is what-issing? ;-)
Yes, that’s right.I can see that I'm trying to understand this through thought rather than DE / looking.
Thought will not help you here.
Yes, that’s right.I'm trying to create a new belief instead of observing in the moment in order to see this for myself.
Belief will not help you here.
Yes, that’s right.I'm looking to thought content instead of DE.
Thought content will not help you here.
When in the previous post you said
that was also thought content, right? And unhelpful as such.The thinking that 'I' can't see through this illusion is merely the illusion, created by identification with thought content, appearing in nothing,
It’s good that you’re seeing all this.
How does it make you feel?
Yes. Some good looking here into the functions of the doer/chooser/controller.The idea of a 'me' is all thinking based on assumption. … Foot started tapping. The noticing of this happened after the movement of the foot.
How and when does an individual “me”/Lisa show up, separate from life life-ing or what-is what-issing ?
Without going to thought, is the assumption there?
What was the assumption to begin with? ;-)
Yes, spot on.It occurs to me that 'looking' is like seeing through the eyes of an infant - preverbal. No words, no thoughts, no labels. Simply seeing, simply hearing, simply smell, simply touch, simply taste.
Not having a clue about what anything is – simply experiencing, taking sensations in. A relaxed sort of curiosity and attentiveness? A curious and attentive sort of relaxation? (whichever you may like to call it)
Can you try and spend the next few days with this attitude?
Trying to notice that gap between e.g. seeing and thought arriving to say “Nice car”, “Home”, whatever; or hearing and the thought arriving to say “A/my dog’s barking” etc., as often as possible?

