Seeking guidance

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
Honeybear
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:48 am

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Honeybear » Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:42 pm

Two things make stuff less sticky:
the lessening of identification with the character
and
the lack of resistance, the allowing of emotions, the allowing of what happens.
Thanks for repeating this. The allowing of emotions is going to take more effort for me.
Just for the next days, simply observe how your life unfolds, what happens, what is the same, what is different. Go explore! :-)
I’ve been looking at this for the past couple of days, and I didn’t notice much more than what I’ve already said about it, but I’ll just repeat myself, to make sure I’ve covered everything:

In general, I don’t feel very different than I did before. What mainly seems different is that I much more often notice thinking as something that’s just happening, rather than believing that “I” am thinking, although I’m still identified with thoughts much of the time. Then also, I have a much clearer sense that the contents of my thoughts are just stories that are running on their own track, in some sense independent of reality. And I also have a much clearer sense that essentially any problem I experience exists in the content of my thoughts. I sort of knew this before, but it’s much clearer now.

I don’t notice big changes in how I respond to people and circumstances. The kinds of things that would make me feel bad before still make me feel bad, but I keep having these little experiences of seeing that there’s sort of nothing behind that—that they’re just very insubstantial stories. (I don’t notice this as much with the things that make me feel good because I seem to be less curious about what’s underneath them, and glad to take them at face value.)

I continue to check that things are really just happening without someone doing them, and I continue to be slightly amazed when I keep finding that it’s really true.

Thanks, Jadzia.

Love,
Honeybear

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Fri Jan 22, 2021 9:05 am

Thanks for repeating this. The allowing of emotions is going to take more effort for me.
Make this a habit.
Tongue in cheek: this path is totally about letting go off everything that you are not and to simply be that what is. As simple as that. ;-)
Emotional work is one of the keys to get there.
I don’t notice big changes in how I respond to people and circumstances. The kinds of things that would make me feel bad before still make me feel bad, but I keep having these little experiences of seeing that there’s sort of nothing behind that—that they’re just very insubstantial stories. (I don’t notice this as much with the things that make me feel good because I seem to be less curious about what’s underneath them, and glad to take them at face value.)
Isn't this interesting!
This fixation on that what isn't liked? And not looking why is something liked, what that does?
You can as starter sit with positive emotions, too. To get into the process and getting used to it.
Have a look, you might enjoy what you find.

Here is a question for you:
Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?

Love,
Jadzia

User avatar
Honeybear
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:48 am

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Honeybear » Fri Jan 22, 2021 9:13 pm

this path is totally about letting go off everything that you are not and to simply be that what is. As simple as that. ;-)
Emotional work is one of the keys to get there.
Interesting! Can you say more about why emotional work is key? I can sort of guess, in that it seems like emotional patterns are often manifestations of resistance that help to solidify a sense of separation, but in general, what I feel like I hear about is that awakening leads to the release of certain emotional patterns, rather than the other way around.
Isn't this interesting!
This fixation on that what isn't liked? And not looking why is something liked, what that does?
You can as starter sit with positive emotions, too. To get into the process and getting used to it.
Have a look, you might enjoy what you find.
Yes, this is interesting to notice. I tried to consciously sit with positive emotions today, and sometimes that was really nice, and sometimes it was a little disturbing. The times it was disturbing were when I would have positive feelings about people I care about, and then feel confused to look and see that my thoughts about them are just thoughts, and just as I don’t really exist in some sense, they don’t either. This was a little uncomfortable—I guess I want the people I love to be real and not be just made up of my thoughts. (I think you know what I mean, but just to be clear, I’m not saying that their bodies don’t exist or anything, I’m just saying that as entities, they don’t exist in the way that I’m used to thinking they do.)

Ok, and now, even in my answer above, I’m noticing how I wrote a half of a sentence about the nice part, and then the rest of the paragraph about the disturbing part!
Here is a question for you:
Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form?
The basic answer is no. You could say that there’s sort of a self at the level of thoughts and concepts, but even that isn’t a distinct thing—it’s just a bunch of different thoughts.
Was there ever?
No.

Thanks, Jadzia!

Love,
Honeybear

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Sat Jan 23, 2021 8:53 am

Interesting! Can you say more about why emotional work is key? I can sort of guess, in that it seems like emotional patterns are often manifestations of resistance that help to solidify a sense of separation, but in general, what I feel like I hear about is that awakening leads to the release of certain emotional patterns, rather than the other way around.
It is both ways.
Behind most emotions there is a belief, how I am, how the other are, what somthing is suposed to be like, what someone is suposed to be like - you get it......no emotion without a story.
And yes, awakening can and will from a certain point on pop the cork out of the bottle of held back/frozen emotional patterns.
Learning to be accepting about that what comes up helps clearing the field and when the nothing-stops-them-anylonger/all-lockers-fail happens one is already well versed in embracing what comes up. :-)
Yes, this is interesting to notice. I tried to consciously sit with positive emotions today, and sometimes that was really nice, and sometimes it was a little disturbing.
In the end sitting with positive emotions equal celebrating a win, on your own or with others, this is always a good idea.
What came up for you was the realization that others same as you are no entities, beautiful.
Does it change your love for them ?
The basic answer is no. You could say that there’s sort of a self at the level of thoughts and concepts, but even that isn’t a distinct thing—it’s just a bunch of different thoughts.
Yes. Sort of like a concept.

Here are three more questions:
Share in your own words what the illusion of separate self is and how it shows up in experience.

How does it feel to see this?
What is the difference from before you started this dialog?

What was the last bit that pushed you over; made you look?

Love,
Jadzia

User avatar
Honeybear
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:48 am

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Honeybear » Sat Jan 23, 2021 5:04 pm

It is both ways.
Behind most emotions there is a belief, how I am, how the other are, what somthing is suposed to be like, what someone is suposed to be like - you get it......no emotion without a story.
And yes, awakening can and will from a certain point on pop the cork out of the bottle of held back/frozen emotional patterns.
Learning to be accepting about that what comes up helps clearing the field and when the nothing-stops-them-anylonger/all-lockers-fail happens one is already well versed in embracing what comes up. :-)
Ok, that’s helpful. Thanks.
In the end sitting with positive emotions equal celebrating a win, on your own or with others, this is always a good idea.
Yes.
What came up for you was the realization that others same as you are no entities, beautiful.
Does it change your love for them ?
I’m not sure. It doesn’t seem to change the actual feeling of love, but it’s still kind of upsetting that what I’m loving is my own mental construct, and I wonder if understanding this would make me love people less over time. I know that we’re not into explanations here, but I feel like this is one place where it would be useful for me to have some way of thinking about the relationship between thoughts/concepts and what’s happening in direct experience. I mean, when I love someone, I don’t love them based on anything that I can find in direct experience—I don’t love them because of colors, smells, sounds, tastes, sensations, or the fact of thought. What I love them for is all in concepts—it’s based on the content of their speech and then ideas I have about their behavior over time—are they kind, funny, decent, etc. But then, I don’t love everyone equally, so I’m making very different mental constructs for different people, and it seems like there must be something happening in direct experience that causes the difference and makes the concepts justified. . . I know that this is probably not actually that confusing, but somehow I’m confused about it.
Yes. Sort of like a concept.


Yes.
Here are three more questions:
Share in your own words what the illusion of separate self is and how it shows up in experience.
The illusion of a separate self is the idea that there’s some part of us that is separate from experience, and is therefore able to receive experience and control certain aspects of it. For me, this feels like there’s a part of my mind here inside my body that’s receiving information from the outside world, processing it, and then controlling some functions of my body and mind—moving, thinking, deciding, etc. Although I believe that I have unconscious mental processes operating, the idea of the separate self is that it’s fully conscious, and is perhaps in control of those unconscious processes. As we discussed early on, the idea of this separate self is a flexible concept that happily incorporates a variety of different perspectives that are sometimes conflicting. So, for example, sometimes it seems like the self is the one thinking, and sometimes it seems like the one that’s hearing or observing the thoughts; or sometimes it seems like the self is the body and mind and sometimes it seems like the self has a body and mind. As a concept, it’s a little slippery, so it’s hard for me to describe it in detail.

In addition to a story about the supposed functions of the separate self, there’s also a story about its character. This includes a whole history based on memories, and then concepts about what this history says about the self—smart or not, interesting or not, attractive or not, loving or not, lovable or not, and so on. Again, because the concept of the self is slippery, sometimes this idea of its character is really fixed, and sometimes you think that you’d still be the same essential self even if you got total amnesia and all of this memory was wiped away.

There’s probably lots more that I could say, but I think that these two cover the basics of what it is—a story about an entity that has certain functions and a certain character. I’m not sure if I’ve answered the part about how it shows up in experience. If I haven’t, could you say a little more about what you mean by this? Because it shows up everywhere.
How does it feel to see this?
It’s a mix!

For the most part, it feels liberating. There are these little flashes of freedom that come from seeing that the stories I’m telling about myself and others are just stories and that basically all problems exist in my thoughts.

Then, also, as we’ve discussed, I’ve felt disturbed by this in different ways. It’s kind of unsettling in general to see that what I thought I was doesn’t exist, and then for a while I was really upset to see this because it meant that there was nothing behind or supporting all of the painful things I’ve thought about myself, and so theoretically at least, all of that pain was totally unnecessary, even if in reality it was just what was happening. And, as I said earlier in this message, it’s uncomfortable to see that the people I care about are in some sense just my own mental constructs.
What is the difference from before you started this dialog?
Well, we just talked about this, and nothing’s really changed since the day before yesterday. But I’ll just repeat what I said before, and if you meant something else, you can let me know.

The main thing that’s different is that I can see that there’s no separate self in here, and I feel clear that I can see it. Before we started this dialog, I could see it, but it didn’t feel clear enough, certain enough, or comprehensive enough.

Then, in terms of my experience, what mainly seems different is that I much more often notice thinking as something that’s just happening, rather than believing that “I” am thinking, although I’m still identified with thoughts much of the time. Then also, I have a much clearer sense that the contents of my thoughts are just stories that are running on their own track, in some sense independent of reality. And I also have a much clearer sense that essentially any problem I experience exists in the content of my thoughts. I sort of knew this before, but it’s much clearer now.

I don’t notice big changes in how I respond to people and circumstances. The kinds of things that would make me feel bad before still make me feel bad, but I keep having these little experiences of seeing that there’s sort of nothing behind that—that they’re just very insubstantial stories. I don’t notice this as much with the things that make me feel good because I seem to be less curious about what’s underneath them, and glad to take them at face value. Maybe I still want the pleasant stuff to be real.
What was the last bit that pushed you over; made you look?
Do you mean pushed me over and made me feel like I saw it? Or made me decide to look in the first place? I think you mean the former, so I’ll just answer that, and you can let me know if you meant something else.

I can’t pinpoint what made me feel like I saw it. The most vivid experience was the time when I was answering questions from Gateless Gatecrashers, because it was a shock. But that wasn’t enough by itself, and then it was really helpful to see that my thoughts don’t control my actions and that I can’t find anything else that controls them either, and to look again and again to see what’s behind my thoughts. Everything we went over was really helpful, though, and I don’t know what the last bit was. I do think that the reason I started to feel bad about it was because it was really sinking in. But I don’t know what made it do that.

Thanks, Jadzia!

Love,
Honeybear

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Sat Jan 23, 2021 6:14 pm

I’m not sure. It doesn’t seem to change the actual feeling of love, but it’s still kind of upsetting that what I’m loving is my own mental construct, and I wonder if understanding this would make me love people less over time.
I get your worry.
In some ways love is totally biased and loving a person and why we think we love the person might tell much more about us then about the person. :-)
And then there is love. Non biased, not that focused and spotlighted on something, sort of just a bit like a life feeling, something more general.
Although I believe that I have unconscious mental processes operating, the idea of the separate self is that it’s fully conscious, and is perhaps in control of those unconscious processes.
Does HB exist other than in the story?
If you would only check in your direct experience, right now, do you find conscious or unconscious mental processes?
In case HB is a part of a story, wouldn't these mental processes just be part of the story too?
What is a story? Does it depict that what is or is it fiction?
Then, also, as we’ve discussed, I’ve felt disturbed by this in different ways. It’s kind of unsettling in general to see that what I thought I was doesn’t exist, and then for a while I was really upset to see this because it meant that there was nothing behind or supporting all of the painful things I’ve thought about myself, and so theoretically at least, all of that pain was totally unnecessary, even if in reality it was just what was happening.
In the story there can be pain and suffering. If you watch a film you can really get emotional, and that is a story which isn't even about yourself, right? The story isn't anything superflous, totally not needed, shouldn't be around - it is that what is, too.
Let that sink in.
And, as I said earlier in this message, it’s uncomfortable to see that the people I care about are in some sense just my own mental constructs.
HB is no entity - so how can all the other be HBs mental constructs?

Love,
Jadzia

User avatar
Honeybear
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:48 am

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Honeybear » Sat Jan 23, 2021 7:15 pm

I get your worry.
In some ways love is totally biased and loving a person and why we think we love the person might tell much more about us then about the person. :-)
And then there is love. Non biased, not that focused and spotlighted on something, sort of just a bit like a life feeling, something more general.
Yes, this feels a little scary somehow—it seems like a loss to be less biased with love, although I’m sure that’s not actually the case, in that you’d gain a lot by loving everyone more.
Does HB exist other than in the story?
No. I thought the question was asking about what the illusion was, so I was trying to say that part of the illusion is that there’s this conscious self that may also be controlling unconscious mental processes. The idea that the conscious self is controlling unconscious mental processes is, for me, part of the illusion.
If you would only check in your direct experience, right now, do you find conscious or unconscious mental processes?
In my direct experience, there’s the experience of thoughts, which I’d call “conscious,” meaning, that they’re being experienced, or that they’re experiences. There aren’t any unconscious mental processes. But when I was answering the question, I wasn’t just referring to direct experience, I was talking about the illusion of the separate self and how I think it operates, so now I’m confused about what the question was asking.
In case HB is a part of a story, wouldn't these mental processes just be part of the story too?
Yes.
What is a story? Does it depict that what is or is it fiction?
I suppose it depends on what you mean by fiction. There are stories that are fiction in the sense that they’re not intended to represent reality at all, and then there are stories that aren’t fictions in that sense because they’re pointing to something that’s there in direct experience. Like if I talk about Snow White and the Seven Dwarves, that’s a fiction; if I talk about how I had quinoa and sweet potatoes for lunch, it’s not. But telling you what I ate for lunch is still a story, even if I don’t call it fiction, in the sense that the “I” is a concept and a label, and the “quinoa” and “sweet potatoes” and “lunch,” are concepts and labels, and in some sense, none of them point to anything directly—they’re just references.

I guess I still want to think that there are some stories that have some reference to reality and some that don’t, and to distinguish between them. Is that not right from your perspective?
In the story there can be pain and suffering. If you watch a film you can really get emotional, and that is a story which isn't even about yourself, right? The story isn't anything superflous, totally not needed, shouldn't be around - it is that what is, too.
Let that sink in.
Ok.
HB is no entity - so how can all the other be HBs mental constructs?
I’m getting confused about how to answer the questions. I just mean that other people are mental constructs created by the thoughts that are happening here, even if there’s no separate entity thinking the thoughts. I understand that there’s no separate entity here, but I still want to call them “my” mental constructs to distinguish them, from say, the other people’s own mental constructs about themselves. I know that in my direct experience, I don’t actually know that other people have any mental constructs about themselves, but I’m just talking conventionally. Otherwise, I have to talk as if what exists is only what’s directly known to me. Since you said we weren’t getting rid of concepts, I wasn’t ready to do that. I still have the idea that other people exist somehow independently and that they have their own thoughts and their own mental constructions.

Part of what’s confusing for me is that I feel like sometimes the questions are pushing me past seeing that there’s not a separate self, and towards seeing that in some sense nothing’s there at all. Both this question and the one about fictions seem to imply this to me. I get little glimpses of this, which are super interesting and helpful, but if that kind of all-encompassing emptiness is what I’m supposed to get from this process, then it’s going to take some more work.

Thank you so much, Jadzia!

Love,
Honeybear

User avatar
Honeybear
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:48 am

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Honeybear » Sat Jan 23, 2021 7:37 pm

Just wanted to clarify: When I say here that some of the questions seem like they’re pointing me to see that there’s nothing there at all, I didn’t mean with respect to the self, which I get. I meant everything—lunch, quinoa, shoes, planets, other people, and so on.

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Sat Jan 23, 2021 9:52 pm

I guess I still want to think that there are some stories that have some reference to reality and some that don’t, and to distinguish between them. Is that not right from your perspective?
We just don't want to make sure that the self doesn't creep in through the back door in some way....

Lets have a look: there are thoughts that point to something which can be got by senses.
There is a colour form whatever and thoughts add "Car".
So bits and pieces of the story point to reality and yet Car is no reality.
Does this make sense.
I get little glimpses of this, which are super interesting and helpful, but if that kind of all-encompassing emptiness is what I’m supposed to get from this process, then it’s going to take some more work.
There is always more to find out, isn't it? LOL
But all further steps are not for LU.

Here are some more questions.
Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work?
Give examples from your own recent experiences to how things happen and how things work.

What are you responsible for? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how this works.

Anything to add?

Love,
Jadzia

User avatar
Honeybear
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:48 am

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Honeybear » Sun Jan 24, 2021 3:31 am

Lets have a look: there are thoughts that point to something which can be got by senses.
There is a colour form whatever and thoughts add "Car".
So bits and pieces of the story point to reality and yet Car is no reality.
Does this make sense.
Yes.
There is always more to find out, isn't it? LOL
But all further steps are not for LU.
Ok, great.
Here are some more questions.
Ok, I’m using “I” and “me” a lot in these next few answers just because otherwise the language is too obscure, but I don’t think that there’s an actual “I” there. I hope this will be clear enough. :-)

So here goes:
Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work?
I don’t actually know what makes things happen or how it works.

Intention is a thought that in some way expresses a plan to do something later. This kind of thought comes up on its own like other thoughts do, either as a verbal thought or as a mental image of something related to the idea of the later thing. When I look at my experience, I don’t know where the thought comes from. I might end up doing the later thing or not, and in my experience, I can’t point to what caused me to eventually do it or not. There might be thoughts about it, but these just come up, and there could have been other thoughts coming up that would have justified the other decision. I can’t tell what causes one or the other to win out.

Decisions and choices can go one of two ways that I can see. First, there’s the kind of choice where there’s a range of two or more options, but I don’t have to really weigh or assess anything because the choice is clear, and then there’s the kind of choice where I have to go back and forth and think about it to decide between two or more of the options. Either way, the thoughts that represent making the choice or that go back and forth between options just arise on their own. Calling it a decision or a choice makes it sound like there’s someone in there deciding, but I can’t find any entity or process doing that, so the terms choice and decision are really a way of describing a situation where there was more than one option available, even if there was no real choice in what was selected.

I can’t find anything in my experience that would have free will or control. There are thoughts about different courses of action, but I can’t point to a thing that selects one or the other. With respect to free will or control in regards to thoughts, thoughts just come up on their own. I can’t decide what to think ahead of time. With respect to actions, it seems like there are different ways that actions happen. Some happen without any kind of forethought at all—like just now when there was a pause in typing, I made a little frown without any thought that I would. Then some actions are simultaneous with thinking—like when I’m typing a response to you, I’m generally thinking the words as they happen, rather than thinking them first and then moving my fingers. The typing just seems to happen on its own. Then some actions are taken after thinking—like just now I thought “I’m thirsty” and then I poured some water from my thermos into a cup and drank it. But as I mentioned earlier, I didn’t have free will or control when thinking “I’m thirsty,” and then the actions of picking up the thermos, unscrewing the top, pouring the water, and drinking it, all seemed to happen on their own.
Give examples from your own recent experiences to how things happen and how things work.
An example of a small series of events involving intention and decisions/choices happened this afternoon, when my cousin and I had plans to go for a walk outside. I had been coughing a little bit in the morning, which isn’t normal for me, but I didn’t really feel sick. Even so, I thought that I should cancel out of caution due to Covid, because I didn’t want to make my cousin sick. I called him and told him that and he said, “Don’t worry about it; I generally think I’m invincible.” I said “Ok, great, I’m glad you’re invincible because I’ve been looking forward to seeing you, so let’s both wear masks and be careful to stay pretty far apart and have our walk.” He agreed, he texted me when he got here, and we went for a walk.

This morning, before the coughing, when there was a thought about the plan to go for a walk, that was an intention. Then when I was coughing, but didn’t feel sick, I had to make a decision/choice about whether or not to carry out the intention. I don’t know where the thought to call my cousin to cancel came from, but the thought happened and the calling happened. When I was speaking to him, in theory I was deciding what to say because there are innumerable ways our conversation could have gone, but the speaking was just happening. Then when he told me not to worry about it because he thinks he’s invincible, there was also a decision to be made, because obviously, the idea that he’s invincible is ridiculous, but on the other hand, we both wanted to have a walk, and I didn’t really think I was sick. So there was more than option what to do, and I can’t point to anything that made me say that I was glad that he was invincible and that we should have our walk. Again, the speaking just happened. Then when he got here and texted me, there was a ping on my phone, and I read it without deciding ahead of time to do so—the ping happened, and I picked up the phone and looked at it. Then I had the intention to go outside to meet him (and really this was also a kind of decision/choice because there was the option not to), but this just happened automatically.
What are you responsible for? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how this works.
This is so interesting because I was just thinking about the idea of personal responsibility today. I feel like this question is really a reframing of the question about control, but focused on the action, rather on the supposed actor. But if I’ve misunderstood, you can let me know.

If I’m understanding the question correctly, I’m not responsible for anything, because there’s no me to be responsible. There’s no one to claim my thoughts, words, or actions, as these just happen. The me who would claim them exists only in the content of thoughts. But interpersonally, socially, and legally, my words and actions have consequences, and so in the content of my thoughts I feel a sense of responsibility for them, and in the content of my thoughts I actually have the desire to feel that responsibility. So the way I was thinking about it today was that privately, I can look inside and see that there’s no one here who’s responsible, and therefore nothing to be responsible for, but publicly, or in relationship to other people, I’m responsible, both in the sense that I’m the agent or cause of my actions, and in the sense that I can be held accountable for them.

An example from today would be that I’m the one who called my cousin—he didn’t call me. So interpersonally, I’m responsible for that action. But really, there’s no one to claim responsibility. It’s just something that happened.

I was trying to look at things that have bigger consequences, either positive or negative, such that I might feel either pride or shame about them, and I only came up with things further in the past. We could say that I’m the one who was first in my class in law school, and I’m at least partially responsible for that because I spent a lot of time studying and worked hard to do it. Looking at me publicly, it makes sense to say that I was the one who was responsible for my hard work, and that hard work was at least to some degree a cause for my graduating first in my class (although I recognize that there were also tons of factors beyond my control in any sense, including the fact that I have the ability to work hard at the kinds of tasks that law school asks of you, whereas I would have no such ability if you wanted me to do math). But there’s no real “I” who worked hard, and so no one who can claim either the actions or the results. Then on the other side of things, many years ago I was at a party with my then-boyfriend, and I kissed someone else while we were there. Interpersonally, I’m responsible for that, and it was an awful thing to do. But really there’s no one who did it—it just happened, and so there’s no one to be responsible for it.

I don’t think that this is really any different from asking who’s eating or anything else, right? There’s no real Honeybear who’s eating, and there’s actually no eating either, but in concepts, yes, that’s the one we know as Honeybear and she’s in fact eating, and not playing the violin or something. Somehow, though, with the question of personal responsibility, I needed to think it through separately earlier today—I think because when I contemplate that there’s no me to be responsible, it leads to vague concerns about total lawlessness, immorality, and chaos. ;-)
Anything to add?
I don’t think so. Except that I love doing this, and it’s so helpful for me, and I’m so grateful for your time and your care.

Thanks, Jadzia.

Love,
Honeybear

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:33 am

Thank your for your answers.
I will show them to other guides to see if they have any questions, maybe we missed something.

This might take a day or two, ok?

Love,
Jadzia

User avatar
Honeybear
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:48 am

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Honeybear » Sun Jan 24, 2021 3:22 pm

I will show them to other guides to see if they have any questions, maybe we missed something.
This might take a day or two, ok?

Ok, great!

I have one thing that I want to go back and double-check about, if that’s ok with you.

Earlier, we were talking about this:
Lets have a look: there are thoughts that point to something which can be got by senses.
There is a colour form whatever and thoughts add "Car".
So bits and pieces of the story point to reality and yet Car is no reality.
Does this make sense.
I said yes, because it does make total sense to me—there are colors/shapes that the mind groups together as a single object, and based on memory and an idea about shape, function, and so on, there’s the perception that the object is a “car.” But in direct experience, there’s just the colors/shapes; the recognition of the function and such is all in thought. We had gone over this early in the process with the example of my head, which was very helpful, and I felt like I understood it then.

What I was wondering about is that, for me, these are some of the questions that point to emptiness and to the fact that everything is constructed by concepts. And, to me, this is a deeper insight than the fact that there’s no separate self. But here, we’re using it as one of the building blocks to see that there’s no separate self.

Because I feel like I can see clearly that there’s no separate self, but I don’t feel like I really have the insight that in some sense there’s not really anything else either, I asked you about this, and you said it wasn’t necessary to gain insight into emptiness as part of this process. I interpreted that to mean that, while I need to understand the basic facts of the distinction between direct experience and concepts when it comes to objects other than the self, I don’t have to fully grasp the implications. In other words, in order to see that there’s no separate self, I don’t have to be looking around me at a world that I know—like really know—to be made up of my own thoughts. Is that right? I started to be unsure just because different systems use terms differently, and when I asked the question, I used the term emptiness, but I only have a limited understanding of what that means. I might be using it wrong, and even if I’m not, the way you use the term here might be different. So I just wanted to double-check that I’m not missing something in my understanding about the self if I lack a real insight into the fact that everything else I experience is also basically a concept. As I said, I think you already answered this, but I wanted to make sure.

Thanks, Jadzia.

Love,
Honeybear

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Sun Jan 24, 2021 3:42 pm

What I was wondering about is that, for me, these are some of the questions that point to emptiness and to the fact that everything is constructed by concepts. And, to me, this is a deeper insight than the fact that there’s no separate self. But here, we’re using it as one of the building blocks to see that there’s no separate self.
Yes. Here in LU we accompany the first step: the cracking of the belief in an entity self with powers over life.
There are more beliefs to look through.
And yes, again. It is pointing to something which some call emptiness. This insight looks deeper and is on the way to crack another belief or what some call fetters. Once the first big belief falls the others come into sight and that happened with you too. That doesn't mean that they are cracked or fully seen. This will happen one day.

Love,
Jadzia

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Sun Jan 24, 2021 3:43 pm

I sent you a pm. You'll find it top right corner next to your username.

User avatar
Jadzia
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Seeking guidance

Postby Jadzia » Mon Jan 25, 2021 8:33 am

Dear Honeybear,

no one has any more questions.
Admin will put this thread into the Archive and invite you to facebook groups and you will have another pm from me.
You will see more threads now, like Unleashed, this is the place for further investigations.

I loved walking with you.

Love
Jadzia


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests