I look again for the "I", still no I to be found. When I am looking, I do not see myself in the story.So WHERE is the I, that is not in the story, but enjoying the story?
As I look I do not see anybody bothered. You are right, when I did not see anybody bothered, I tried again to answer intellectually. Thank you for pointing this out.Here we are looking at what doesn't need any guesses.
So, again, what is the "self," here and now, without any assumption or imagination?
When I look again for where the I is, I do not find the I. I see there are no boundaries as things are happening. Things just are.It’s impossible that you are nothing and everything simultaneously. This is just a story.
Since WHERE is the I that could be everything?
Everything is, but where is YOU?
I do not see "I" anywhere.
Ah, I like that. What if there is no looker? With that question, as I looked and couldn't find the looker, I saw the thought arise, and it was just that a thought.What you are missing is that you don’t question the BELIEF that there must be a looker.
What if there is no looker?
I look and look for the looker, but none to be found, and I see the looking taking place. I see the idea of the looker is a thought and just that.What if there is looking happening, but there is nothing doing it?
NoIs there a blower of wind?
Does wind need an entity that is blowing it to a certain direction?
NoDoes rain need a rainer?
Is there a rainer somewhere hiding making the rain rain?
Please look at the trick of thoughts here.
This is correct that I am looking at it that way, and I continue to look to see it differently.The above sentence assumes that there are 2 entities there:
- the unfindable looker
- and the unfindable ‘I’ that is identifying with the unfindable looker
Can you see this?
I absolutely see this and starting to see it more clearly, though I need to keep looking at this.
This is great advice. I look and look and as this belief comes up and is questioned, the belief (or thought) just disappears.Why don’t you question the belief?
What if the belief that there must be a looker is false?
Yes, Who is believing the belief?
As I look at the watched and turn around to see the watcher, there is nothing there!! There was a thought that there should be somebody but yet there is nobody.So turn around! Turn the attention around from the screen (watched) to the watcher! What is there?
If it’s there, it should be very plain and clear.
Watch the watcher! Is this possible?
I see this needs to be seen experimentally and when I need to understand both experimentally and intellectually that is just a thought, only a thought.
I cannot watch the watcher as there is no watcher!!
I will continue more looking at this tomorrow. I am seeing it differently today and need to continue to look.
Thank you!!

