Do you recognize this as all thought stuff ? What credibility does it have inherently and what credibility are "you" allocating it ?
Please be more verbose.
Sorry for the long delay. As we continue these discussions I find it more difficult to say these things in a different manner.
I do recognize it all as thought stuff, although in the middle of these occurrences that recognition is lost. When the idea of the self emerges, it becomes more than an idea, it formulates an identification. If "I" am evoked, it FEELS like me, I know intellectually that its a thought, an ideal, and I even know what triggers it. But it still feels like me. Yes, I have moments where through conscious effort I look for that little space that is NOT me, to find the place where suffering cannot exist. But the space is tiny, and that feeling that I am there is very real.
So I understand on an intellectual level that there is no self, and I have SEEN how the self is created in a flash, out of nothing. And I can, sometimes, find a little space around that self, which precludes it being something that arises in space. I have, to some degree, understood that the space is likely who I am, and certainly not whatever arises within it.
Even the idea that "space is what I am" is something that arises in the space ...
What I experience over and over, along with most people, is the identification with that thought of I when it arises. That identification doesn't go away just because you know about it.