Hi Sarah
I've had a good go at this. It is possible to just let the feeling hang there. Thoughts do arise, and mostly I can just watch them. Occasionally the drag me along with them until I see what's happening.
Then what happened?
Once I notice that I'm following the thought stories, the stories stop or kind of loose their hold and I can return to just observing thought again.
Apart from that which recognizes all experiences – does anything else stay the same? Ever? Or is all in ever changing flux? Clouds across a sky. Waves in the ocean. What wants that special feeling to stay? Or wants bliss or some other permanent experience?
Nothing stays the same. Only what notices experience stays the same. The experiences come and go. Everything comes in and out of experience or awareness as and when it happens but nothing is constant except the thing that notices. I guess it has to be constant and unchanging so that when experience happens it can be recognised against the unchanging background.
Is that "me" the information was being noted but not by what I recognised as "me" still there? Have a look. Does it ever leave?
Yes it's definitely still here. I don't think it ever leaves. I think it is "that which recognises all experiences" as you stated above.
OK – Check and recheck with this feeling of ‘I’. Is it always there? Really?
I've been looking more tonight to see if I can find an "I" in here anywhere. And I've discovered some more stuff. I made some notes of what I found so here goes .......
Where is I. Well when I was at work today it was there. It was there when I had to have conversation with work colleagues. It was also there when I had tea with my family tonight, and when I was asking my children about their day. The sense of I was there then and it came in useful because - I don't know - it seems easier to communicate with people if I can feel a sense of I.
However it's just occurred to me that when none of these type of events are taking place, there is no need for an I at all. It's far easier now for me to sit for a while without a sense of I , and so I do that whenever I can. However I've noticed that as I sit with no I being present (and no need for one) , a thought pops into my head "this would be a good time to check out where the 'I' resides". And as this thought arises, so an I pops into existence !! It's like the 'uncertainty principle' in physics, I don't know if you've heard of that but basically it's about the way that it's impossible to actually measure or even observe something without the act of observing it affecting the outcome. So it seems with 'I'. As soon as it's thought about, there it is !!
So it follows then, that I is just a thought. Even when there's a feeling of no 'I' just the merest nudge in the 'I' direction causes it to come again- because it's being thought about. It would also make sense then to say that just as I sit in this room thinking about work, I know that it's just a thought and I'm not really at work, I'm here in this room. Work is just a memory. It's the same with I. There is no requirement for it while I'm sitting here, it too is just a memory - just another thought !!
The other thing I've noticed that follows on from this is the way that an 'I' feels present whenever I'm thinking about doing something. Invariably , thinking involves me having a conversation about something with myself in my head. This brings a very distinct sense of an I being present. I've noticed that this seems mainly to be because of the words that are used ie. "You must remember to do this", answered with " yes I'll try to remember ". Both parts have an I reference which brings about the thought of 'I' again. I'm trying to see past this by observing the conversation as just more thought strings that may contain important information but don't actually point to anyone who has to do the remembering. The words are just habit of language if that makes sense !
It's probably true that the 'I' isn't needed nearly all the time, but I'll need to have a look at this some more.
Hope this is not too much for one post. Thanks for the link you sent me to the Joan Tolifson piece. It's put things in perspective regarding weird experiences and expectation. It's not that I don't want nice experiences but I don't want them to become a goal - something to persue. If they happen then great if not, then that's OK too. What "is" isn't one particular thing it's all things. I'm just beginning to see this now.
Thanks Sarah
Take care,
Rich