Hi,
1) Why do you keep on playing this thinking game?
It is an old habit, I used to be want to be an author, used to think about all these plots inside my head. Being an engineer by training, also do lots of thinking and visualizing in my line of works.
2) What has your thinking gained you over these past few weeks working with me?
The thinking is a hindrance that prevent direct seeking. Thoughts create separation and pain. Again my ambition to be a writer affect me. As a writer, you are suppose to experience pain, so that you can write it down.
Without thoughts there will be no pain, no separation.
3) What has it cost you?
The thinking and thoughts as a whole create pain. It also create an attachment to the thoughts.
Exercise with an apple ( I am not very sure about the experiment, trying my best):
4) in the direct experience of the sensation can you find where fingers end and apple starts?
Yes, I can feel where the finger ends and the apple starts.
5) Can you find two things in the sensation itself, “fingers” and “apple”?
No, I feel fingers and apple as one thing.
6) Still with eyes closed, can you lift and smell the apple?
Yes, I can lift the apple with my hand and smell it.
7) Focus on the scent sensation -- can you locate a specific “place” where this is taking place? Can you find a division between subject/object in the actual sensation of scent arising -- nose smelling apple?
No, I cannot find a place where the sensation of scent start. Cannot find the division between subject/object, nose smelling apple.
8)Can you observe the precise point at which apple ends and table(finger) begins?
With my eyes open, I can observe at which point apple ends and finger begins.
9) How do you know that “apple” is a separate object?
Apple as a separate object is a "recognition" created by thought. Without thought, apple is not a separate object.
10) Are they anything more than colors? Do they say anything about 3D? What would the experience of “apple” be without thoughts about distance, light, shadow and space? What would experience of “apple” be without the thought “apple”?
Without the thought of colors, distance, light, shadow and space. the apple is just become part of your body. Just like the clothes you wear on your body, after a while you are not aware of the clothes.
11) Can you find “apple” as a distinct entity in direct experience separate from these disparate and divergent sensations?
No, apple disappear in direct experience.
13) What is the relationship between these disparate sensations and the label “apple” that makes this thought-label “correct”? Is “correct” an actually existing relationship between things or is it a label that some thoughts give to other thoughts about things?
The label "apple" become correct when relate to past experience which is also thoughts. "Correct" is just another label created by thoughts.
I slowly understand what is direct seeing. Without thoughts, then what you actually see.
Thanks for the guidance,
Liang