Good. Check if there is even something that chooses where attention goes to? See if attention is deliberate or happening automatically on its own?Attention wavers from I / me labeling, to direct experience back and forth, (not deliberately so, but as in falling out of direct experience back into I / me thinking, then discovering that and shifting focus back), as in following the exercise you gave me.
No, we have already discovered that thoughts cannot think. When you drive a car for example (or van in NYC), do you need to “think” every move to operate the car or does the body simply operate the car without any thought needed? Or when you brush your teeth, do you need to think in order to brush the teeth? Thoughts arise and add a layer on top of direct experience. So, notice difference between direct experience and a layer of thinking on top of that.YOU: Test, check, look and pay attention to how thoughts show up.
Me: If I were to do that for myself, am I asking questions of a thought? What would they be? OR Am I simply noticing the difference between a thought that starts with I/me vs one that is direct experience?
The point of observing thoughts is simply to recognize that thoughts arise on their own without anyone/anything thinking them. Things happen, body acts, observing happens and sometimes thoughts show up describing what is happening and/or claiming ownership and/or something else…
The fact that there are thoughts is not a problem. The problem is when we claim thoughts, when we believe we are thinking them. So check that. Do you own thoughts? Do you think thoughts? Are there any thoughts that are “intended” or are all thoughts completely automatic? Is there any control of thoughts at all?
One of my favourite quotes from ‘Sailor’ Bob Adamson that sort of relates to that issue and consequences of ownership of thinking is: “What’s wrong with right now, unless you think about it?” I think it's a great quote to ponder a little. :)
Kind regards
Milan

