The color we label as RED is actually experienced.When you look at the word label ‘GREEN' , what is the actual experience?
The color RED is experienced.Is the color red ‘experienced’, or is the color green ‘experienced’ as the label suggests?
The label GREEN does not have a one-to-one experience with reality, no matter what font color is used. It is a word or symbol used to communicate. You could use another word. These are the labels we were taught to use as children for the experiences of different colors.Does the label ‘GREEN’ have a one-to-one correspondence with ‘reality’? Or does the label suggest something else other than what is here now (red colour)?
The label suggests GREEN, but the actual experience is RED in this example.
No, ‘green’ is not associated in any way with the experience of the color red. Green is an overlay.Is 'green' associated in any way with the experience of the colour red; or is green just a label that overlays the actual experience of red?
No, if you replace ‘GREEN’ with the label ‘GOOD’ or ‘BAD’ the redness is unaffected. These are all just labels.If the label ‘GREEN’ is replaced with the label ‘GOOD’ or ‘BAD’ , is the redness affected in any way as the labels suggests?
Redness cannot become ‘good’ or ‘bad. The labels have no effect on reality. The labels have no effect on direct experience.Does redness become ‘good’ or ‘bad’, or do the labels have no affect whatsoever on ‘reality’?
What is seen is color. Labels do not affect what is actually seen. Labels can change depending on the language used. What is seen does not change.Let me know what is SEEN.


