Yes! the mental picture i have of this was clarifying as here's reality underneath and here's thought on top, and I was looking for the bridge or where one contacts the other and influences it but there isn't one.. water and oil floating on top of it, they don't mix at allThis is great stuff. I wouldn't call any aspect of experience realer because 'realness' is just another abstraction that doesn't interact with the actual experience. Are you starting to see how thought cannot interact at all with the "other stuff"? No matter what you think or believe, it doesn't alter the "other stuff", only your interpretation of them, which is then back in the layer of abstraction.
a question can only exist in thought, so answers must be limited to thought also. even an "answer" found in an experience is thought-ified immediately - the experience is the experience, the answer to the question is still a thought even nonverbal that says "that", and points to a memory, which is a thought. there is no problem-ness, no challenge-ness, no situation-ness even in reality, these things don't exist outside of thought. all judgement thoughts, not reality. doesn't *feel* true right now, it definitely feels like i have problems. but then "it doesn't feel true" and "i have problems" are both thoughts.You say you're coming to accept there isn't a thought-based answer, but is there such a thing as an answer not based in thought? Does the entire paradigm of there being questions and answers and problems and solutions even exist outside of the layer of thought abstraction?
Thought is a problem-solving tool, but problems are a thought creation. However, thought can also be used to solve the problem of itself which is what you're doing now. It's like a snake eating its own tail.
it keeps doing it, even nonverbally in spells of mental quiet there's a sense of "what now?". notice and let it be i suppose, enjoy the quiet while it lastsHahahahahah. Yeah it's hilarious actually ;''''DD. "What do I do?" is a thought. It's one of the first thoughts we can have. The mind creates a problem then gives itself the job of solving it. That's the entire purpose of thought.
coincidentally (or maybe not..) i stumbled into something like this today, ill just copy it out of my notes. more poking to do here:Inquire into this: Who's asking "if not thought, then what do i do?" Where is the one who's asking that? Where does that question come from?
sitting with what is the next thought, a little sleepy so mind wandering kicks in but no big deal. end up off task and having a dreamy little back and forth with myself in thoughts playing both halves of a conversation then pause a sec - "who's asking here and who's answering?" instant fear response in the body. that feels significant, try and focus on that - too grabby maybe, it slips away. repeat the question, fear again, seems to disappear quickly when i look directly at it, slippery. not quite the "sat with it and it faded away" sorta deal, it actually feels like it's building stronger and then its being seen and hiding so that i can't look at it. warrants further playing with this question
I'll start looking into death more. Feels confronting saying that, though i'd have said as a reflex i don't fear death itself as much as i fear dying painfully, but its not total acceptance of death in any case. There's both fear and relief in there thinking about it. Since i'm still here i've implicitly answered the question as to whether suicide would be a better option thus far, but i've certainly "kept it in my back pocket" so to speak at various times in my life, it's a comfort in a way. But there's definitely fear of death in there. Fear death but fear extremes of physical pain more. But you're right, that pain's not happening right now and may never. the belief is happening, and that's its own unnecessary pain. don't think it's going to fall just like that but time to try and keep mortality front of mind and see how the fearful future thoughts look when death itself looks a little realer to me
couple of extra notes for the day
----------------------------
hah! work situation first thing in the morning, answering a question and then had a wait a sec moment, that sounds like an assumption! have we verified this before we dive into trying to work out a fix for this supposed problem :)
is there actually only one master assumption that everything specific is just a form of - "i know how it should be/should have been/will be, which is per my thoughts about it". and if the thought story is contradicted by actual experience then it must be reality that's wrong, and i take that personally
very little reactivity today, but to be fair very few interactions to test it, just quiet overall. did notice that my to-do list of minor tasks wasn't pulling me in multiple directions at once and wasn't producing a sense of urgency and stress out of proportion to the actual importance of those tasks like often happens. i'm doing this thing, and i'll get to the next thing when i get to it. which one? doesn't matter, next thing is the next thing its not important right now. not in a forced "stay focused" way just noticing that that's how it is
also noted: no real emotional fluctuations today, just pretty even-keeled and ok all day. a minor flash of irritation here and there when something comes up to deal with, but seen and gone in a moment not a mood carried around for an extended period

