Thank you for your lovely post. I so understand what you're writing about. Thank you for sharing what is going on with you.
This is just an ideia you have about what is going on, yes? You think you haven't seen, while you are looking, and can't see a self in what you're looking at. Ahah, that's how the illusion works. You look it in the eyes and it still tricks you into believing that what you're thinking is more real than what you're seeing.Still I haven't seen how what is happening is not caused by the self.
What happens if you approach this the other way around? When you look to what is happening, is it caused by a self? Caused by a findable thing, that is separated from other things, some-thing permanent, solid, always present?
Yes, I get that, but I don't think that's how this goes. Let me try to explain.Only by logic can I understand that this is not possible as the self is only an illusion.
First you see.
Then, eventually, understanding happens.
Whe can and are used to rely on logic to try to understand everything, but when our understanding changes our logic changes. So, how reliable can be something that shifts into something else? The way you understood life in your childhood and the way you understand life now isn't the same.
This seeing is always the same. It's reliable and always available. You may think and feel and understand what is being seen, but it's the seeing that is always accurate and available and present and here/now.
There is no need to understand or to use logic to see what we are pointing at on LU.
Can you see a self when you look?
If you can't, that's it.
It may take a while to grok this, but is as simple as that, it's just plain looking, without overwriting the seeing with thinking about the seeing. And when overwriting happens you know that the thinking isn't about something real, the same way you know you can be thinking about Santa, at Christmas time, and Santa isn't real.
Dearest, isn't the absence of a real self, here/now, the answer to all doubts?Returning to my hands moving over the screan... writing this - I cannot distinguish what is making the operation working if not the self. So I am watching the hands.... nothing comes to clarity.
There must be some reason(s) why you can't trust what you can see (or can't see) at the time being. Most likely some fear or expectations. Do you have any idea of why you seem to be a little stuck? At the moment what makes you believe a self is real?
Take care,
S

