Wow! this was an eye opener!
Could it be that I'm trying to abandon unhappy/bad Dave, while retaining and keeping hold of good/happy Dave? Hmmm, That's a revelation! Dave doesn't exist outside of a thought, EVER! This is confusing! I'm going round in circles.I feel good again at the moment,
Ah, here comes the story! Dave has just been created. And Dave's believing the story of Dave.
You don't exist!!! Look and check that out again.
Wait! What you're pointing out here is that DAVE DOESN'T EXIST!! EVER!!! NEVER DID!!!! Duh! How my mind LOVES to convolute what is simple.
I think I had an expectation that the sense of self would NOT remain! There are times when there isn't that sense of self, just what is happening at that time. When that sense of self returns, it's often seen as "Just a thought, and a physical sensation, neither of which constitute a "ME"" My expectation was that the situation would stabilize into a permanent "non-selfness".Yes, interesting how it begins to feel that it's a lie, that the 'I' is just pretending to exist. The sense of a self can still remain, just it's not identified with. It's just another feeling that arises. And the story still unfolds, just it's not 'your' story anymore.
There is nothing that holds the expectation, just a thought that says "I have an expectation".What is it that holds this expectation?
Is an expectation a real thing?
Or is it just the content of a thought?
What does the thought say?
You never have existed outside of a thought, Dave is just a label. Yes? Check it again.
An expectation is just the content of a thought that just happens, and is followed by another thought that says "That's MY expectation". There's no one here having expectations, just a thought that says it's so!
"I" don't exist, Dave is just a label, a language convention, all that ever has exists is whatever is happening here and now, and "Dave" can never be found in that happening outside of a thought.
Yes, this thought still remains! But there's no one here thinking it! Let me repeat what you said. Dave thinks he hasn't made the enlightenment grade - check. BUT it's recognized that there is NO DAVE to not make the grade - check. Hmmm. Dave isn't free, and yet there is no Dave that could ever be free/not free.But still the thoughts arise that Dave hasn't made the enlightenment grade yet, yes? It's the same old program running the show. Ditch the program - there is no Dave to achieve anything, never has been. It's just a story concocted from sensory inputs and thoughts and feelings. Can you find anything that is experienced other than sensory inputs and thoughts and feelings?
This is clearly absurd! I have the urge to do lines, like they would make us do in school, just to drill the message home.......
THERE IS NO DAVE, NEVER WAS
THERE IS NO DAVE, NEVER WAS
THERE IS NO DAVE, NEVER WAS
Haha! How many would I have to do before I start to believe what is so obvious? No, I DO believe already, before I SEE the obvious! And besides, that whole last paragraph is just the story of Dave again.
There is nothing here but sensory inputs, thoughts, and feelings, as you said. Some of the thoughts suggest a "ME" because as a small child this body/mind was convinced of there being such a thing. But the fact is that there never was a me/Dave/self/I, it's just not true.
This is a HUGE question! Umm.......What has to happen, according to your thoughts, before 'Dave' is officially no more? A big bang and fireworks? A merging into the golden light of eternal bliss? What's the storyline? Whatever it is, forget it. Let it go, it's a myth, a story. What if it's the very thing that's keeping 'Dave' in place?
.......... I guess the truth is that NOTHING has to happen. If I look at my hand for example, all there is is a hand (let's not get into a discussion about space and molecules etc. I'm a human being living a human life :P) ....a thought may come saying that "I" am looking, but it's JUST a thought, with that realization the "I" is meaningless and dissolves. If the thought is accompanied by a physical sensation, it goes away with the above realization also. I can apply that exercise to ANYTHING, instead of "ME" listening, there's just hearing, or seeing, tasting, moving, feeling, whatever. There isn't a "me" in any of it, never was, so what needs to happen?........ As you suggest, the "storyline" has to be dropped, in this moment it is dropped, but how to stop it from returning?....... I guess that's not going to happen, but when it returns it needs to be dropped again.... and again..... and again...... and again. Eventually it has to stop returning... right Odemira? Say it's so.
There has been a big realization here, that what is holding "me" back is the expectation that the experience of being selfless should be permanent. It's a very enticing carrot! There doesn't seem to be a way of drooping the program that's running, other than to keep seeing the truth. That appears to be the value of coming here every day to be nudged and reminded.
There's a feeling here that if we could get away from using language for a while, that would help. It seems that there's little we can do in the way of communication that doesn't involve and encourage the use of pronouns, which is probably the very reason that culture developed the idea of a separate self to begin with. Just a thought.
I'm very grateful for this experience and your patience.
Thanks Odemira!
Dave :)

