Marcus
Good to hear from you as always.
Recovery is defitely happening thanks!
Very glad to hear it!
Having convictions around moral or ethical questions isn't good or bad, life is life, personality and such, but could the agenda of the seperate self be muddying the waters so to speak?
Some of the great spiritual masters go after the 'wrongs' in the reletive world and hold pure convictions with compassion, charity, truth and justice etc.
It feels a little off piest, but I am curious about what these 'very strong opinions' are?
If you feel it's relevant I'd like you to write into what some of these are and if possible detect if they are they arising on behalf of the seperate self, its history, fears, conditioing?
Fascinating and perceptive question.
To clarify what I mean by "very strong" opinions - these aren't necessarily things that I spend a lot of time thinking about. But when I was looking for beliefs, and looking at the quality of the various opinions/views that came up, I had a sense that some were much more "solid" than others in terms of how easily I feel they could be changed or contradicted.
On the one hand, it seems that most if not all of the strong opinions I can identify feel like they are fundamentally based on moral or ethical principles - fairness, justice, kindness, equality, etc. I suppose from a certain point of view these are all "dualistic concepts" but they just feel fundamentally right.
On the other hand, when I examine any of these opinions, I can easily find or at least surmise that they are shaped by the experiences or desires of the separate self. I suppose this is bound to happen - the moral or ethical code of the "individual" is shaped by its environment, conditioning and experiences.
To go into some specifics. In my country (UK) we have a right-wing government that consistently follows policies that make life harder for the poorer members of society while benefiting large corporations and the rich. Their ministers are frequently shown to be liars, corrupt and self-serving. They pursue goals that appear to be based on ideological dogma rather than what is in the true best interests of those that they are meant to serve. They exhibit an air of superiority and condescension in their words and responses, fundamentally they don't appear to genuinely care about the "little people". I am - as you can probably tell - very firm in my opinion that such governments and politicians should not have the power that they do. So, on the one hand, I could say that these views come from a basic moral/ethical framework valuing fairness, equality, the right of everyone to have opportunity. On the other, these are shaped by my own experiences. I have been poor, I have been homeless, I have been unemployed and struggling to feed myself, unable to make my way forward. While that is not my experience now, some residue from that clearly carries over.
I have very strong opinions when it comes to the world of work, the way that many employers seem to behave - not paying their staff well, not providing safe or comfortable working conditions, demanding more time than is due, seeking to influence or control the personal lives of their staff. Again, feels like it is based in those principles of fairness, but also clearly derived from my own experiences in the workplace and a general dislike of being controlled, a sadness at having to spend large amounts of my time on this planet doing things I don't particularly want to do for people I don't want to have "over" me. This was much more pronounced when I was employed by "for-profit" companies, I would find myself very annoyed that the end goal of my labour was to increase the profits of some anonymous shareholders rather than positively impact anyone's life.
I am strongly opposed to racism/sexism/homophobia/classism etc and all those who propagate it. Largely these have not been my direct experience as a straight white male, but my past experiences of being in poverty, and even back to being bullied during my schooldays, undoubtedly play into it.
I have very strong opinions about how people should be treated in relationships - professional and personal. I hate to see people exploited, abused, taken advantage of etc. Again, a mix of ethics and my own experience coming into play.
I strongly believe in the value of truth and knowledge, so I can react strongly against misinformation and lies, especially those who spread them to others to further their own agenda at the expense of those they spread them to. The anti-vaccine profiteers, Covid-deniers, the Brexit movement in my country, all would cause a sense of despair especially when you would see their lies being parrotted by "regular" people.
I could go on, but I think this is more than enough of a sample. I do think it's worth mentioning that my relationship to these opinions seems to have shifted somewhat of late. If they arise in a situation or conversation, my conviction about these opinions is just as strong. I don't think anyone could convince me to vote for a right-wing government, to support racist policies, to restrict workers' rights, etc. But on reflection, I notice that a lot of time used to be spent actively following such topics, almost seeking outrage (which sounds ridiculous when you write it down). I'd follow politics very closely, and feel deep emotional responses to what I saw. Now, I still read the news, I still follow up on topics that interest me, but I'm more mindful of the fact that I can't control or influence such things, that hatred and corruption will always exist, and while I still stand against them it serves very little purpose to obsess over them.
To give reason to this question - from my own experince, much of my missionary zeal about 'the way things are' have been calmed from this process and investgating my fear and disgust about what is happening in the world has been so helpful in revealing deep-seated existential/personal fears that were relating to possible death/anihalation/humiliation/punishment/guilt/shame etc.
Basically my world-views were very much wrapped up with my conditioning and I'm curious if there's something here to to investigate?
It has certainly been interesting to look at. Undoubtedly there are some fears at the root of some of the stances I take - I feel strongly about the rights of the less fortunate because there is some residual fear of being one of those myself, a fear of having my own rights and freedoms restricted, of becoming poor and being unable to provide for myself and my family. The money side of things is an interesting one - I don't particularly fear poverty for myself, I sometimes think I could quite happily just live in a tent in the woods, disconnect from society and forage for my needs, but I sense I carry some fear for those that depend on my ability to provide and (to a lesser extent) the judgement of others if I was to fall down the social ladder.
Just to bring to awareness again to what is being adressed here, this is taken from the documents I sent you at the start. "In the context of Liberation Unleashed, liberation refers to the clear, unambiguous and direct realisation of the absence of a separate self. Not everyone (perhaps no one) comes to the Gate without at least some degree of latent tendencies. What we refer to as liberation may not be what you expect of it. Seeing self for what it really is - a story, does not mean that your life is suddenly upgraded in every conceivable way. Old habits, beliefs, programming and conditioning will very probably remain in place. Awakening from the story of you allows old patterns to drop away quickly. The foundation upon which these patterns were based is gone. In this sense, liberation is just the beginning."
Thank you for the reminder. I did read this at the time but didn't refer back to it when you asked about "the Gate" again. When I read this before, when I started this thread, I was looking at it as a description of "what might happen". Now it reads more like an apt description of "what has happened".
So yes, liberation would seem to have happened. As it says, old habits/beliefs/programming/conditioning does remain, but the conditions for these to drop away certainly exist. It certainly feels like a beginning more than an end.
Your final question pointed me back to my initial post on this thread. It was very interesting to read it again - it's actually quite remarkable how my perspective on what I've written seems to have shifted in a relatively short amount of time. Rather than respond in a massive block I'll break it down a little.
What are you looking for at LU?
I'm stuck in a place that seems to be quite common - relentlessly seeking while being sure I've already seen all the answers.
This is no longer the case. I don't feel stuck, and I wouldn't say I'm really seeking any more.
I have read/watched/listened to many teachers and at an intellectual/conceptual level I totally "get" the principle of no-self, but it's not a felt experience.
I sense there was some romanticising of the "felt experience" happening here. I said it wasn't a felt experience because I wasn't feeling the experience I expected - enlightened ego-boy still wanted to levitate.
I am still bothered by intrusive thoughts, mental dialogue, suffering - it's like I get lost in my head sometimes.
A lot of judgements here, when I read it again. I still experience thoughts that pull at my attention and I still hear mental dialogue. I wouldn't say I judge the thoughts as intrusive and try to resist them, they just happen. Some thoughts can still cause that stomach feeling that I equate to suffering - for instance, my thoughts sometimes seemingly spontaneously bring up memories of past actions or situations that I feel regret or shame about - but that feeling, and the thought, are just allowed to go.
When I'm fully engaged in an activity I am mostly able to remain as such, but it's like there's a part of me that is constantly seeking for some kind of distraction.
Judgement, again. The "seeking for distraction" largely references things like phone-scrolling or looking for podcasts/music/games etc when there's other stuff going on. I still do these things but I don't judge them as "distractions". The mind is seeking stimulation and that's just what's happening, I don't look on those behaviours as inherently negative just by labelling it as "distraction". There is another category of "distraction" that links to the next line, and here there has been a change of habit:
When I don't have an immediate task at hand, I find myself going back over the same teachings and forums as if some words there are going to fix my problems.
Yeah this is definitely not the case now. I still find myself occasionally looking at non-duality forums/videos but not with the same drive or purpose. When reading forums it's more out of an interest in what other people are asking or how their questions are being answered, more out of curiosity rather than finding something for myself. As for the videos, I seldom even finish watching them now, it comes from the same curiosity combined with a lingering fondness for some of the teachers I've enjoyed listening to. If I'm looking for anything there it's more a comforting reminder rather than trying to GET something.
What I am looking for is to not just believe and understand non-duality, but to actually FEEL and KNOW it.
More romanticising, I think. Capitals for emphasis by ego-boy.
I want some respite from the noise in my head, I want to stop seeking, I want to stop going round the loop of spiritual content trying to "get it" or attain some kind of "enlightenment".
Tick in the box there. Think there was a subtle meaning of "I want the noise in my head to stop" which I wouldn't say has happened, but it doesn't bother me as much or engender as much emotional feeling.
No matter how often I read this, in my head I think I still conceptualise realisation/liberation as some kind of amazing state.
...and I can see why. If I'd read some of my answers today when I first made the post, I'd probably think the "me" writing this now was in some amazing state of bliss. Which I'm really not, but nevertheless, today's answers are what's happening.
I get confused when I see it described as not so, because it's often followed with a description of old patterns falling away, suffering decreasing etc.. and that sounds pretty damn amazing to me.
This feels less confusing now. At least in my case, these changes seem to be happening gradually, imperceptibly. No big bang or fireworks here. In fact it's only on going back over my previous words and responding to your questions that I really appreciate how much things seem to have changed.
I'm definitely not "stuck in seeking", to quote the thread title. It feels more like I'm in the process of integrating this understanding into my life, reconciling my old habits/behaviours/beliefs/opinions with this new perspective - but this isn't something I'm actively "seeking" or even "doing". When thoughts and feelings arise I sometimes feel a pull to give a little focus to investigating them, so I do. Others, I don't see anything that needs to be queried, so I let them play themselves out. I still occasionally behave in a way that seems to come from a place of emotional reactivity, but after the fact I just look into the nature and cause of it rather than harshly judging myself for what I did.
I think I've written quite enough to be going on with. This has been a very "enlightening" exercise, to re-look at words from before and see the gap between the "then" and the "now". I seem to have made more progress than I had given "myself" credit for. Interested to see what you make of my responses.
Love
Paddy