In one hand you say "it seems not to be seen", in another hand you speak the end of the search.It seems not to be seen, but rather felt. When listening to non dual speakers, it resonates with what’s felt. For instance there is no judging anymore (even if I try), no searching for «the next» or become «a better version of self», no knowledge is «needed» and actually nothing is needed anymore. So it is more of an intellectual understanding of what is felt without actually «seeing» it, if it makes sense.
Are you still seeking OR there is no need for seeking anymore ?
Seeing no self is not seeking for experiences of bliss. Experiences come and go. All experience has a beginning and has an end.But after reading Tony Parsons’s «the open secret», it was seen that no one read the book. «Bliss» (laughter, lightness and happiness) happened for 3 days. But the clarity seems to have faded, so again - there’s just an intellectual understanding and might memory yes.
I invite you again to quote each question and answer to it.
When it was seen that there is no separate self and at which circumstances ?
What was seen in your own words ?
Is there a seer or a knower of what is seen ?
Warissem

