I spent some time mulling over what you wrote and reread the post several times.
It took me a while to understand what you were saying and even now when I reread it there is a bit more that I see.
I spent more time in that meditative state of just seeing and have concluded that, truly, there is no glass until my mind notes that there is a glass. It’s there as object and maybe not even that.
But that realization is so simple isn’t it?
Of course, there is no recognition of it being a glass because that recognition happens in thought; it takes the mind to interpret it as a glass. And that’s with all things isn’t it? Me saying that’s a dog, or that’s a cloud, or that’s a car is all things the mind is noting. If I didn’t speak English it would be named something altogether. Back to the if a tree falls in the woods… again it’s the mind saying that’s a tree, it’s falling, and this is the sound it makes.
We cannot have a direct experience of a self because self exists solely in the mind—just as a glass, and dog, and love, and green, and everything else exists solely in the mind. I‘m now wondering if we can even have direct experience of anything. Touching the keys of my keyboard feels like it’s direct experience but if there is no mind activity I’m not sure it’s could even be called “touching”.Can we have a direct experience of a self, or is self a concept to describe our unique responses?
But still… there is doubt. It’s like the illusion is known, but it has not been dropped at the level of perception.
Sending thanks,
Barry

