Hello Nuss
. Thank you for your continued efforts with me, Jon
Well, it's absolutely my pleasure.
. It wasn't taken as criticism. I was what needed to be said, so I appreciate you saying it. It feels as if I'm "chasing my tail" at this point, only the ironic thing is there was no tail in the first place.
Let's see about this. You're right about no tail but maybe the "chasing" bit can be addressed.
. Yes, there is a feeling that this method of direct inquiry will "get rid of the self," as opposed to seeing that there was not one in the first place. It comes back to something said much earlier in our conversation-having conceptual understanding of something, but not fully accepting or seeing it. It still feels quite close.
Ok. Well, conceptualising about existence of self, (or not) can seem like tail-chasing, until it subsides or gets dropped.
I think you're onto something about needing to notice that there never was one. But consider; if there was or is a self, then how could it be gotten rid of?
Getting rid might conceivably be an option, like throwing out something that's really "there," in the first place, (like a bag of rubbish from the kitchen or an old record-player, for example). But it seems particularly hard to find this "self" . Hmm.
. I'm sorry for taking so long to respond. I didn't want to send a response until there was a feeling that I had something worth sending to you. I didn't want to waste your time with another message saying "still looking for it." I have been pondering this question for a while: "Who is it that is getting 'caught up' or 'off-track?'" Nothing can be found. It seems so simple, yet "something" is hanging on. "Who is hanging on?" Still nothing!
I felt that you were probably giving it the necessary time and I appreciate your thorough approach.
But yes. What is it about that hanging on and still nothing?
. Please know that I really am taking your help very seriously, and because so I want to make sure my responses are worthwhile.
This has always been clear Nuss. Thank you.
. There was also quite a lot of work to be done this past week in preparations for school to start next week. That took most of the time out of day, yet there were still many moments where the "self" attempted to assert itself.
If you've ever grappled with shoelaces that have become knotted, or any kind of knot in string, its a little like this. The knot doesn't 'exist' as such (except as an idea). It's not really a thing that's "there". Of course, for practical purposes we use the label "Knot" to describe this kind of situation. But in reality It's string or laces that have become criss-crossed or looped tightly (I realise that this too can be refuted and that only sensations are actually experienced and that is worth investigating too, but bear with me)...
Investigation into "self" can be like wishing a "thing" to go away or dissolve and tugging at the strings only makes the knotty sensation or perception seem tighter.
There's a key for every lock. There's a way of relaxing or "seeing" which is basically to stop tugging. The "knot" doesn't immediately disappear (usually). Why should it? It keeps appearing. The universe has given this odd situation somehow and there's always the possibility of viewing it as a problem. But it's the fixation with a me-problem and the tendency to feel that it's a real problem for someone that may hurt.
But when faced with a knot, relaxing and taking an interest, rather than straining, can help.
So how to stop seeking? How to stop trying to get rid of self?
Well, you can't, can you?
That's a blessing actually.
Love
Jon