Jens freedom

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Wed May 29, 2019 11:40 pm

Hi Jen,
No, apple is not known. I did the looking with my coffee cup as well, and find the same thing. It seems anything that has been labelled-'whatever"-cannot be known as its “name”.
Great!

Look at the display before you.
When seeing it, is there any division between seeing, seer, and the seen?
Are these three separate?

If yes, could you find the boundary between the three? Not an imagined, conceptual boundary, but an actual boundary.

Repeat this several times during the day. Please let me know, how it goes.
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Fri May 31, 2019 10:56 pm

Hello Dear Vivien,
Look at the display before you.
When seeing it, is there any division between seeing, seer, and the seen?
No, there is no division.
Are these three separate?
No. There is no separation.
If yes, could you find the boundary between the three? Not an imagined, conceptual boundary, but an actual boundary.
There is no actual boundary.

Repeat this several times during the day. Please let me know, how it goes.
What I find, is that when this exercise is repeated as instructed, I get the very same result. There is no separation. I did this exercise with many things; my chair, my foot, a person, the lake, the moon, my bird, a tree, the sick person in the bed where I work, the lady jogging down the street…….
What I see, what my direct experience is, is that there is NO SEPARATION AT ALL, in any of it.
I can see this, very clearly, when looking in the way you pointed!!!!!

This is all that is true. There is no separation.

What I see is that this is why what I see is me, and what the meaning of oneness is. Why if I hate or love something or someone, it is really me. They are me, and I am them. I am you and you are me, “it” is me, and I am “it” (whatever “it” may be).

This is why it is insane to get angry, or annoyed, or pleased with what someone else says or does, because it is all the very same thing. There IS no separation.

Thank you, thank you, thank you. There are not words to thank you, ever enough, for your pointing.

Love,
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:39 am

Hi Jen,
What I see, what my direct experience is, is that there is NO SEPARATION AT ALL, in any of it.
Great!
What I see is that this is why what I see is me, and what the meaning of oneness is. Why if I hate or love something or someone, it is really me. They are me, and I am them. I am you and you are me, “it” is me, and I am “it”
There is no separation, yes. But what makes this non-separation ME?
How is it known that ‘they are me, and I am them’?
Yes, there is no separation, but how it become a ME?

Image
Notice that when you go by direct visual experience alone, the way the tree is distinguished from the sky is by colour only. The ‘border’ or the ‘dividing line’ between the tree and the sky is just a sudden change in colour.

Normally we believe that shadow implied depth. But shadow is just a darker shade of colour.

When going alone with seeing only, there is nothing else in the image about shadow than the difference in colour from the surrounding areas.

And what about light? Light is the same as shadow. Just a change in colour, nothing else.

Look at the tree. There are some changes in colour labelled ‘darker’ or ‘lighter’, which thought implies as differences in depth, closer and far. But actually they are just some changes in colour.

Can depth actually be experienced?
Is there really a 3 dimension or only 2?

Look at the white colour labelled ‘clouds’. Are those far or further away from the tree?
And is the tree closer?
Can ‘closer’ and ‘far’ be experienced at all?

Is there a foreground or a background?
Is there an experience of ‘tree’ apart from colour?


We normally believe that colour is coming from the independent object (tree). But is there really an object hiding somewhere behind the colour, or an object which is ‘emitting’ the colour?
Is there the experience of a physical object (tree) behind the colour, or independent of colour?


When going along with seeing only, is there anything else directly experienced about the tree other than colour?
Is there an objectively existing tree or sky or clouds or grass at all?
Are there separate objects present?


Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:53 am

Hi Vivien,
There is no separation, yes. But what makes this non-separation ME?
OK, I used the word Me as if a separate thing but this is not what I meant. It’s hard to explain the experience without using words!
How is it known that ‘they are me, and I am them’?
Because in doing the exercises, the direct experience is that seer, seeing and seen, what we always believe the illusion of being a separate “thing” or entity as the one “seeing”, is not true, because there are no boundaries that we can locate, define, measure or prove.
Yes, there is no separation, but how it become a ME?
No, it doesn’t become a “me”. As I said above, there is no division, separation out of, or boundary of Me.
Can depth actually be experienced?
No
Is there really a 3 dimension or only 2?
There is only 2
Look at the white colour labelled ‘clouds’. Are those far or further away from the tree?
There is this appearance but it is not so.
And is the tree closer?
No
Can ‘closer’ and ‘far’ be experienced at all?
No, depth or distance cannot be directly experienced.
Is there a foreground or a background?
No
Is there an experience of ‘tree’ apart from colour?
No, you cannot directly experience “tree”
We normally believe that colour is coming from the independent object (tree). But is there really an object hiding somewhere behind the colour, or an object which is ‘emitting’ the colour?
Is there the experience of a physical object (tree) behind the colour, or independent of colour?
No, it is not possible to experience “tree”.
When going along with seeing only, is there anything else directly experienced about the tree other than colour?
No, just color
Is there an objectively existing tree or sky or clouds or grass at all?
No
Are there separate objects present?
No, just an experience of different colors.
Love Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Tue Jun 04, 2019 1:49 am

Hi Jen,
No, it doesn’t become a “me”. As I said above, there is no division, separation out of, or boundary of Me.
Great!

Have a look at the following picture. Thought says that the door is open and that there is space between the edge of the door that is seen and a road and trees behind the door. But is there?

Image

Now, go open your front door like it is in this picture and have a look. Is the open door actually taking up ‘space’?
And is there ‘space’ between door and the trees and road behind the door?
What is actual experience?


Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:38 am

Hello Vivien,
Now, go open your front door like it is in this picture and have a look. Is the open door actually taking up ‘space’?
No. There is no experience of "space"
And is there ‘space’ between door and the trees and road behind the door?
No.
What is actual experience?
Colors and shapes.

Love,
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:17 am

Hi Jen,

Sit in a chair somewhere quiet and take in a couple of deep breaths and start to notice just the ‘body’, the chair, floor, rugs, furniture and walls. Without thought, all there is, is colour which thought then labels as clothes, or body, chair, wall etc (we are only looking at colour for this exercise).

Now look carefully.

1. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘body’ and the colour labelled ‘chair’ be found?

2. Is there a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘chair’ and the colour labelled ‘floor/rug’?

3. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘floor/rug’ and colour labelled ‘furniture’ be found?
Is there ‘space’ between ‘floor/rug’ and the ‘furniture’ or is there just simply colour?

4. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘floor/rug and furniture’ and the colour labelled ‘wall’ be found?
Is there ‘space’ between ‘floor/rug’, ‘furniture’ and the ‘wall’ or is there just simply colour?
What do you find?


Is there an actual dividing line between any of these “colourS” or are they just simply seamless colour which thought divides into ‘things’ and further divides in into many different colourS and labels them as pink, black, yellow, green etc?


Is there such a thing as “space” or “distance”?

Is there an actual body/you sitting in a chair, or all there is, is colour?

Is there an appearance appearing, or is there simply AE of colour?
And is there a seeing AND colour or are they one and the same?


Image

Is there anything Jen that is not totally clear and you would like to further look at? Anything at all?

Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:23 am

Dear Vivien,
I am still working to answer these questions. My story requires some intensity of my time at the moment, but I wanted you to know I may need a day or so more, please! Thank you!
Love,
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:22 pm

All right Jen. Thank you for letting me know.

Have a nice day,
Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Fri Jun 07, 2019 11:33 am

Dear Vivien
1. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘body’ and the colour labelled ‘chair’ be found?
No
2. Is there a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘chair’ and the colour labelled ‘floor/rug’?
no
3. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘floor/rug’ and colour labelled ‘furniture’ be found?
no
Is there ‘space’ between ‘floor/rug’ and the ‘furniture’ or is there just simply colour?
Just color and no space
4. Can a dividing line between the colour labelled ‘floor/rug and furniture’ and the colour labelled ‘wall’ be found?
no
Is there ‘space’ between ‘floor/rug’, ‘furniture’ and the ‘wall’ or is there just simply colour?
no
What do you find?
It is all just color, with no dividing lines or separation
Is there an actual dividing line between any of these “colourS” or are they just simply seamless colour which thought divides into ‘things’ and further divides in into many different colourS and labels them as pink, black, yellow, green etc?
Yes it is seamless color. That thought divides and labels
Is there such a thing as “space” or “distance”?
No.
Is there an actual body/you sitting in a chair, or all there is, is colour?
just color
Is there an appearance appearing, or is there simply AE of colour?
AE of color
And is there a seeing AND colour or are they one and the same?
They are one


I
s there anything Jen that is not totally clear and you would like to further look at? Anything at all?
No Vivien, thank you so very much. You have pointed me to no self and I can see this. I now am working on the emotional barriers and clinging that keep me in suffering. Thank you for your patience, your time and the love you extend. I am forever grateful for you.
Love,
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Fri Jun 07, 2019 11:43 pm

Hi Jen,
No Vivien, thank you so very much. You have pointed me to no self and I can see this. I now am working on the emotional barriers and clinging that keep me in suffering. Thank you for your patience, your time and the love you extend. I am forever grateful for you.
You’re very welcome :) but don’t leave just yet :) Here are some final questions. Other guides will have a look at the thread to ensure that I have covered everything and that my pointing has been clear.

Can you answer the following questions with some detail please, and answer what's true for you rather than any sort of 'ideal' answer. Also please provide examples where asked.

1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form?
Was there ever?

2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience.
Describe it fully as you see it now.

3) How does it feel to see this?
What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.

4) What was the last bit that pushed you over; made you look?

5) a) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how things happen and how things work.

b) What are you responsible for? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how this works.

6) Anything to add?


Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:08 am

Ok Vivien!! I am not going away yet! Please stand by for my answers in a day or so!
Love,
Jen

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:10 am

Hello Vivien,
Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form?
Was there ever?
No, there never was, is not now, and never will be. This is the grand illusion.
2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience.
It is the illusion that there is a separate entity or self, in this case labelled “Jen”, that started from very early childhood and being told over and over again that I was a separate thing. Then, I started to believe and identify with that separate thing called Jen, believing it to be a separate “me”, with it’s own body, story, ideas, thoughts.
Describe it fully as you see it now.
Now, it is what gets caught up, or believed to be the “hero” of the story of “Jen”. The illusory individual “me” that has all these percieved problems, good times, bad times, relationships, dramas, thoughts, a body, bodily identifications, etc. that make up a separate Jen.
But, there is no separate Jen. There is no separate anything. There are labels, constructs, and thought forms that we believe to be real and separate things, people, distances, time and space, which are all illusory.
3) How does it feel to see this?
It is freeing, and as if a light has been turned on. But it is also the cause of much turmoil for the false self, as it wants to continue to believe it exists as a separate self named Jen . Even though I have seen through the self, and have had the direct experience of no-self, it’s almost as if the false self wants validation, wants to be believed as being real (and is now having temper tantrums). This happens to this body/mind most frequently as a solar plexus “punch”, which gets assigned an illusory meaning. For example, there is a sensation in what is labelled the solar plexus. It gets labelled as “stress”. It relates to , or happens during work. There is an incident at work that my story states I am responsible for. So this sensation in the solar plexus gets labelled “stress” and gets attached to the “Jenself”, which now feels stressed. The sensation becomes identified as being “a me”, or part of “me, Jen”. When it is only a sensation that has been labelled, and attached with a thought that “Jen is stressed' and this is due to this event at work'. Thus, the illusion is created: “This work situation is difficult and stressful to me”. The false self is not taking annihilation lightly! So, you could say at this point in time the experience is LOTS of uncomfortable sensations and thoughts coming up that the false self is tempted to cling to, but now, since looking, and looking again and again, they are not “sticking”. But it is very very uncomfortable, with all the gut punches! The beauty of it is though, in all of the uncomfortableness of the sensations, these are the red flags that say, LOOK!!! LOOK!! DO YOU SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING???
What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.
When I read back from my very beginning posts, I see that now I have clear seeing, or at least much, much clearer seeing about what the no self is and what it is not. Additionally, I see quite clearly that I had many misperceptions and fears. There is nothing to fear about reality.
4) What was the last bit that pushed you over; made you look?
I don’t think I fully understand this question…..do you mean recently as last bit, or last bit in a general way, relative to my entire process of looking?
5) a) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how things happen and how things work.
These are all constructs. There is no decision maker, no intention, no free will, no choice and no one or thing in control. Nothing makes things happen, there is just seeing, hearing, touching, tasking, smelling, thinking. It all just happens.
When I resist what happens, what is just unfolding, then there is suffering. Allowing what is to be and being in the flow, with not trying to change, control,label, make different what is, is how it is seen that the seer , seeing and what is seen is the same. This goes for, hearing, hearer, heard; thinking, thinker, thought, etc.……it is all one.
b) What are you responsible for? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how this works.
Nothing. Suffering happens when I think I “should” do this, or “want” it to be this way, or “have” to figure it out. There is no one who has to figure out anything. It all IS. When I resist nothing and allow it all to unfold, I find I am part of the greater whole, and need do nothing. “I” just “know” what to do. I do nothing, “It” does me.

6) Anything to add?
Yes. It seems that all the illuory me’s are part of the greater whole of Light/Love that are mistakenly perceiving Light as separate entities, which are all the contructs of thoughts, concepts, labels, stories, bodies, that make up the vast illusion of separateness.
love,
Jen

User avatar
Vivien
Posts: 9122
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 3:07 am
Location: Australia

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Vivien » Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:48 am

Hi Jen,

Thank you for answering. I have some further questions.
Then, I started to believe and identify with that separate thing called Jen, believing it to be a separate “me”, with it’s own body, story, ideas, thoughts.
What is it exactly that ‘started to believe and identify with that separate thing called Jen’?
What is it exactly that ‘was believing it to be a separate me’?
Even though I have seen through the self
What does the word ‘I’ point to in the sentence “Even though I have seen through the self”?
What is it exactly that has seen through the self?
I see that now I have clear seeing
What is it that has ‘clear seeing now’?
When I resist what happens, what is just unfolding, then there is suffering
What is it exactly that could ‘resist what is just unfolding’?
When I resist nothing and allow it all to unfold, I find I am part of the greater whole, and need do nothing.
What is it exactly that ‘finds that it’s the part of the greater whole’?
What is it exactly that could ‘resist or allow to all unfold’?
It seems that all the illuory me’s are part of the greater whole of Light/Love that are mistakenly perceiving Light as separate entities,
What is the AE of a ‘greater whole of Light/Love that are mistakenly perceiving Light as separate entities’?
What is it exactly that ‘is mistakenly perceiving Light as a separate entities’?
V: 4) What was the last bit that pushed you over; made you look?
J: I don’t think I fully understand this question…..do you mean recently as last bit, or last bit in a general way, relative to my entire process of looking?
What questions or exercises (or anything) made you look or help to see through the illusion of the separate self?

You didn’t give examples from you recent experiences on questions #5a and #5b.
So could you please give examples to:

5) a) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how things happen and how things work.

b) And to What are you responsible for? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how this works.

Vivien
The most profound discoveries arise from questioning the obvious.

Website: https://www.viviennovak.com/

Blog: https://fadingveiling.com/

User avatar
Jenisfree
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:05 pm

Re: Jens freedom

Postby Jenisfree » Mon Jun 10, 2019 11:59 pm

Hi Vivien!
What is it exactly that ‘started to believe and identify with that separate thing called Jen’?
What is it exactly that ‘was believing it to be a separate me’?
Nothing. An illusion of a self.
What does the word ‘I’ point to in the sentence “Even though I have seen through the self”?
What is it exactly that has seen through the self?
Nothing. There is nothing to see through anything. It is hard to not use words when communicating!
What is it that has ‘clear seeing now’?
Nothing
What is it exactly that could ‘resist what is just unfolding’?
Nothing.
What is it exactly that ‘finds that it’s the part of the greater whole’?
Nothing as a separate entity at all . No-thing.
What is it exactly that could ‘resist or allow to all unfold’?
Nothing.
What is the AE of a ‘greater whole of Light/Love that are mistakenly perceiving Light as separate entities’?
Words fail here. It is experience.
What is it exactly that ‘is mistakenly perceiving Light as a separate entities’?
Nothing.
What questions or exercises (or anything) made you look or help to see through the illusion of the separate self?
The questions with the tree about depth and distance.,
The doorway and space
The hand and the illusory boundaries
The question with Seeing, seer and seen being the same
The questions toward the beginning about thoughts being containers with false contents.


Y
ou didn’t give examples from you recent experiences on questions #5a and #5b.
So could you please give examples to:

5) a) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how things happen and how things work.
OK, when I remain in the present moment, and do not try to do, be, think, resolve, take action about anything, I find that all of these “actions” or movements happen all by themselves. An example would be when I am at work (I work in a very busy acute rehab setting), and there is a story regarding a patient that has to be resolved, with many “tasks” to be completed to resolve an apparent problem or issue in their story. When I am still and open, without trying to find “the solution” or “do the right thing” I see that the answers, the actions, the specifics are already “figured out”. I am like the puppet just “doing” whatever needs to be done, and even “what needs to be done” is an illusion in the story. I am the “actor”, (I go through the movements) but I am not the “doer”. It can be very easy to mistake that “I” am the doer, thinker, problem solver, etc, but the reality is that it is all just happening beyond the control of anything. The outcomes, the events, the “situation” is not at all within my or anyone’s control, although we build up huge illusions and misconceptions about all of it. But further, all of it, every single bit of it, is an illusion, from the story, the building we are in, the people in the story, the problems that do not require a decision maker, or controller, or a chooser. At all apparent “levels” it is all an illusion. Nothing makes things happen.
b) And to What are you responsible for? Give examples from your own recent experiences to how this works
Nothing. There is nothing to be responsible for or to. For example, when I let go of the thoughts that would “tie” me to a particular event, or if I do not cling to a concept of a “me” needing to “do, be, have anything at all, or if “I” let go of the illusion that I need do anything at all, be the decision maker, chooser, planner, or that I am “supposed” to be doing “something”, or “that it is my fault” then I do not suffer. What IS just unfolds. For example:

‘I dropped a glass and broke it in my kitchen.’
I=illusion.
Dropped=a concept
A Glass= a fiction/label
Broke=a label/fiction/concept
It=the thing labelled, in this case, the glass
In my kitchen=concept/fiction/label/illusion
But in the story,’’ I dropped a glass and broke it in my kitchen’ itself is a ficticious concept, which is all pieced together with ficticious meaning and labels to make it into something other than the truth of what is.

It is: sensing color, texture, sound

With the labels, concepts, etc, it becomes a separate “ something” or “event” to cause emotion, which can then attach to a false self, and label something as “bad, annoying”, and then we have separation and suffering.

Love,
Jen


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 144 guests