When I asked this question it was an error. I can't see an experiencer. This is relevant to the question that I asked you in my last post. I asked if there is in fact not much to see. I was struck by the starkness of things when previously I had assumed complexity. Seeing is just one thing, hearing is just one thing, looking is just one thing etc. I have looked at it a lot now. Looking itself does not seem to help once what is seen is established. It is a bit like those people who win the lottery and keep checking the ticket. It is still there, still the same and yes what you thought you saw is what is.Find the looker or experiencer. Wher is he? What does he look like? Is he the same as the one thing? Don't try to find him by thinking about it. When you experience something, look into your first-hand experience. Where is the experiencer?Is the looker (the experiencer) the same thing as sound, thoughts, movement, seeing, touching etc? If so what is the acceptable label of that one thing? Life?
One reason I will continuously slip up in the way I have is because I have to remember stuff. I can't look at all things all the time. Another reason is that I still feel that there is the 'I' to deal with in everyday life just as it was before. So of course I am switching from what appears to be true most of the time to what is true when I focus on it. See, that was another slip. Of course I am not doing those things. That may be an acceptable way of talking but that was said out of habit.
Thank you Ghata.
Mav

