Yes, I agree with it. This what I heard and learned from my parents, my teachers in the school and also from the society.Do you find that the assumption of the existence of a separate 'self' is more or less built into language?
It would be fun to start to talk each other in a passive way:
- I opened the door at 5 am.
-The door was opened at 5 am.
Yes, because there is a belief generally that individual 'I' exists and how it is important.So that an idea of 'I' is enshrined within everyday speech?
Yes, they are here and now.So, there is sensing, seeing, hearing and so on. These can be experienced in the moment, right here and now, can't they?
'self' is a sensation as well but there is no direct experience of it like touching the face, the direct experience is immediately there, there is no gap in time. Therefore we start to look for this 'I' but this search fails at some point because you didn't get an experience of the 'I', it is still just a feeling or thought which remains in a mist.If you touch your face there is an immediate sensation. But what about the feeling or thought of 'self'?
Here I would like to ask also what is the difference between the feelings and thoughts? Is it the same? What is the purpose of using them?
It is more like a Santa Claus. This 'I' feeling looks real.Does the feeling or thought of 'self' make a real separate self come into being?
Or is this like Santa Claus?..seeming to be a real guy who comes down the. chimney with presents until one day it is realised that Santa only ever was an idea?
The question is here on which day this realization happen that there is no 'I'. :)
As we also come to that point in the childhood that Santa does not exists and it was just a click moment at some point in the time, without any preparation or too much thinking. Or maybe I cannot remember well for that moment. :)
Thank you.
Balazs

