Liberation vs neuroscience.

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
Pratityasamutpada
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:40 pm

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby Pratityasamutpada » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:53 pm

I can put my conscious mind to rest and let nature take over. Of course there are times, like now, that I have to use my conscious mind
Who puts it to rest, at what point does nature take over, or at what point do you take over from nature? Who takes over from nature? Who is using that conscious mind? Who owns it?
There is a part of me that's getting fraustrated. There's a part of me that wants to quite, give-up. There's parts of me that's calm, at ease, there's part of me that's in pain. my shoulder has a sharp pain, my back is aching, i'm ready to do chores. Etc.
This is great :). Now we're talking actual experience. I don't know if you've awakened as you said, it's certainly not impossible. But if so, you seem to have hit snooze. One thing though, you do know how to observe thoughts as an experience, just like you observed frustration, desperation, calm, pain, etc. So that's good.

Now whether you're sleeping or snoozing, what you need to do is keep looking at all those places you put that "I". Look at your thoughts, or at the stuff you write, you know how to do both. And see where the "I" pops up, or where there is an image of "you" doing something. Catch those, and then check your experience to see if you can find this supposed "I" that the thought claims to be referencing. Right now, for example, who is reading this post? Whose voice is this in your head?

Do this everytime you catch a self-referential thought. Look at what is happening in that moment and where "you" is. Take as much or as little time as you need, do it as often as you need, let us know what you see.

User avatar
buddhawarrior
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:27 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby buddhawarrior » Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:29 am

wow, just typed a huge reply and site logged me off and lost the whole thing.

Let's try again. Maybe I can summarize.
Who puts it to rest, at what point does nature take over, or at what point do you take over from nature? Who takes over from nature? Who is using that conscious mind? Who owns it?
The ego is put to rest. Nature needs not take over, it was always in charge. It was the Ego's illusion that it had any control at all. The brain contains the conscious mind, I own the brain, when the brain dies, I die and so does the conscious mind. Now you got me philosophizing, but you gotta know, I speak from experience. I have had numerous out-of-body experiences where I saw the map to my consciousness quite clearly.
I don't know if you've awakened as you said, it's certainly not impossible. But if so, you seem to have hit snooze.
A bit aggressive don't you think. Pratitya, out of curiosity, what do you think awakening is exactly?
Now whether you're sleeping or snoozing, what you need to do is keep looking at all those places you put that "I". Look at your thoughts, or at the stuff you write, you know how to do both. And see where the "I" pops up, or where there is an image of "you" doing something. Catch those, and then check your experience to see if you can find this supposed "I" that the thought claims to be referencing. Right now, for example, who is reading this post? Whose voice is this in your head?

Do this everytime you catch a self-referential thought. Look at what is happening in that moment and where "you" is. Take as much or as little time as you need, do it as often as you need, let us know what you see.
I'm just going to go stream of consciousness here. What I'm experiencing when I read the above text is this. I'm taking a five year back-step just to answer these questions. I've already been there done that. Now when I start asking "I" questions, I get this jerking sensation in my core and out of the crown of my head, a giant spot light hits the inside of my head and I am catapulted into a resonating white/black infinite void where an overwhelming peace washes over me and a buzzing starts to dissolve my body until I'm free of it and just consciousness floating. Eventually I'll get pulled into orbit by some very real dream/drama, sometimes gruesome, sometimes angelic, and I'll get mired in the drama, getting sucked in deeper and deeper, and eventually I'll be reminded of the "I" question or some other spiritual practice and I'll again be jettisoned into the void. This all happens instantaneously, although sometimes it can feel like weeks. Tracking your thoughts is so amateur, breaking it down is for the novice, it happens so quickly for me, two mutters of a mantra and I'm off to heaven.

This self-referential loop is a paradox, there is no answer, no solution, you literally cannot solve for it. maybe you haven't taken it that far, maybe what I'm saying is too advanced for you. Take a computer and ask it to prove it's own existence, it will overheat and burst into flames. That's literally my internal experience of the question. It's a quick way to get high. Have a chuckle over the cosmic joke. But the high diminishes like any other high. The first high was the best. Are these guys beginners? They're still stuck in Maharshi-ism. Are they students posing as teachers? maybe I'm the teacher posing as a student. I don't have to prove myself to anyone, my awakenings are my own and non-transferable. If they don't understand what I'm saying it's probably because they haven't been there yet themselves. I feel like a reluctant messiah, Look at what they did to Jesus when he tried to teach. But then I'm reminded of my bodhisattva vow, no liberation till all is liberated. There is no you, no me, we are all here trying for the same thing. Be patient Buddhawarrior, answer the questions for the benefit of all sentient beings.

There is a part of me that is frustrated, but I'm not angry, a bit detached actually, like someone hired an actor to play the role of frustrated ranter.

But here's the deal. Stop asking silly questions. The "I" paradox is just the beginning. Yes, we've seen past it, so now what? Create a forum, create a hierarchy, those who are in's and those who are out's, have the in's haze the out's? Create a dogma, and then a religion?

This is a question for Ingen, Ilona, and Pratitya. What is your purpose here? Is it to be like computer program pointing back to the "i" everytime it's mentioned? Because that's old and unoriginal. Ingen said it best.
Oh please, that was lame. You can copy this sentence out of any vaguely spiritual book or website.
If you can't see past your own game, you will not get anywhere.

My goal here is to help and be helped. I have real experience, and real knowledge and have a lot to bring to the game. I Know I can help others and I know I can use the help myself. But what I want is real discussions, real solutions, opening up to each other and sharing our stories on the path. I'm done playing "I" games. I saw past that long ago. It's a great tool and I see it has been very helpful to many people here as it has been for me. But it's not the real thing. I have the rest of my life to live, and practical matters need practical solutions. If you are unconvinced by what I'm writing, it is probably because you haven't been there yourself. But being an automaton and asking the same questions will not help you, nor me.

anymore questions?

User avatar
Ingen
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:39 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby Ingen » Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:22 am

anymore questions?
Is that a rhetorical question? It sounded like your goodbye speech. Correct me if I'm wrong.

It could very well be that you are somehow way, way more enlightened than me. I have never seen light explosions.But the criterion on this site is to see through the illusion of self.

If that is too stupid for you, sorry.

User avatar
Pratityasamutpada
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:40 pm

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby Pratityasamutpada » Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:15 am

I don't know if you've awakened as you said, it's certainly not impossible. But if so, you seem to have hit snooze.
A bit aggressive don't you think. Pratitya, out of curiosity, what do you think awakening is exactly?
Just pointing out a possibility, my friend. For what it's worth, I'd been more or less on snooze for months until I came here. There was no judgement in what I said, that's not what this is about, but you seem to doubt my intentions. I'd love to talk with you about awakening, but not here. This place is not for talking about awakening, it's for awakening.

Didn't you come here to at least give this an honest go? Or if you're awakened as you say, to join in helping others? Surely you can see that getting defensive or boastful is hardly convincing. Maybe you don't trust me, but you seem to do fine with Ingen, except when she actually challenges you. Are you willing to continue on with her in earnest?
This self-referential loop is a paradox, there is no answer, no solution, you literally cannot solve for it. maybe you haven't taken it that far, maybe what I'm saying is too advanced for you. Take a computer and ask it to prove it's own existence, it will overheat and burst into flames. That's literally my internal experience of the question.
Reality is not paradoxical, it only starts to look that way when taking a perspective on it. You won't burst into flames when asked to prove your own existence, either it can be proven or it can't. There's no boggling the mind with thoughts any more than there is boggling a canvas with an "impossible" Escher painting. It's all in the interpretation. But when you simply look without interpreting, there is suddenly no problem anymore. It's just there and you can see it for what it is. That's what is being done here with regards to thoughts of "I".
They're still stuck in Maharshi-ism.
There's no philosophy here except what you keep bringing into it, BW. You're trying to argue your way out of this, but that alone should clue you in that you're abandoning the actual for the abstract again. This is what I mean by snoozing, and I say this with heart-felt sincerity, snap out of it. Stop trying to argue the actual, it's not possible. Nobody is trying to argue with you here or make you look bad or impose any dogma on you. Can you at least trust that much?
I don't have to prove myself to anyone, my awakenings are my own and non-transferable.
No you don't have to prove yourself, except you came here asking to be confirmed. I don't know what awakenings (plural) you are referring to, and right now those aren't the issue. This place is about just one very specific awakening, and no fireworks or prophetic imagery.
anymore questions?
Are you sure you want more questions? You didn't seem very willing last time around. If you're serious about wanting to help others, I can only suggest that you stop making a show out of this and actually get it done. It's your choice though. What do you say man?

User avatar
buddhawarrior
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:27 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby buddhawarrior » Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:45 pm

If that is too stupid for you, sorry.
Wow, I'm sorry to have caused offense, but I did say I was going stream of consciousness. Those were the threads running thru my head. I'm not attached to them and neither should you, but if it brought up defensiveness in the reader, maybe that's something to look at. (no, just kidding) Please do not take the last post as a fixed position. Perhaps it's the 1am, or the fact that I had to type that twice. But please see past the frustration and look at what I wrote, the content.

I started this thread to have a conversation about what is beyond the "I" questions. Then somehow the thread became, "Is Buddhawarrior liberated." I don't claim enlightenment, or liberated, or awakened. I have had many sparks of insight and moments of clarity. But that doesn't mean anything. Life has to be lived moment to moment. The inner visual hallucinations are just another one of the traps, much like the paradox of the "I". What I'm asking is for you to stop asking me whether of not I'm liberated or see the truth or whatever else spiritual one-up-menship is going on, and just talk. Then I was told that once I proved myself, I can join some private part of the site where we can finally do what I'm asking. So I said, fine, test me. What's the purpose of this site? To provide a direct pointing method of liberation? Nothing else? Can't it be more. Can't I bring questioning to your methods, to your thoughts, test you? If you're method can not be tested, then it's not very good right? What we are after is TRUTH, so let's do that, not stick to one method, but really allow everyone to question, and for all of us to answer honestly, not go meta, meta, meta.

We have seen thru the illusion of the ego. but that's not the end of the journey.

I apologize sincerely for any harshness broadcasted. That's not what I am intending. But now the ball is in your court. I say, "let's play." what do you say?

User avatar
Ingen
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:39 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby Ingen » Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:39 pm

You can easily see our "method" and our results by reading the threads in the "liberations" section. There will be no discussion about methods and enlightenment here. We ask questions, you answer - with 100% honesty.

If you want to follow these rules, let's play.

Who or what is reading these lines?

User avatar
buddhawarrior
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:27 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby buddhawarrior » Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:47 am

Surely you can see that getting defensive or boastful is hardly convincing.
I sincerely apologize, again for that hiccup. apparently that thought thread has been brewing for a few days, and last night it butted in and took over. But I do apologize.
What do you say man?
We ask questions, you answer - with 100% honesty.
Okay, Let's play.
Who or what is reading these lines?
Me. I am. I'm the one reading these lines. That's the simplist thing that comes to mind. And in a funny way very true. Any further labeling, or words or talking about it, describing it, gets us further away from the real me. The fully natural me, that operates floating on the waves of Kharma. That's who.
But when you simply look without interpreting, there is suddenly no problem anymore. It's just there and you can see it for what it is. That's what is being done here with regards to thoughts of "I".
This is the deepest truth.
You're trying to argue your way out of this, but that alone should clue you in that you're abandoning the actual for the abstract again. This is what I mean by snoozing, and I say this with heart-felt sincerity, snap out of it. Stop trying to argue the actual, it's not possible. Nobody is trying to argue with you here or make you look bad or impose any dogma on you. Can you at least trust that much?
Thank you, I see that now. that was just a thread too. A strong one. Got a hold of me pretty tightly. argh. Yes, I see what you mean by "abandoning the actual for the abstract..." and thank you for saying "snoozing" because it does get tiring to relax fully. And I get tired and fraustrated and want to snooze for a while and just live. Which is incredible funny because all I want to do is to "just live" yet the scientific thinker self keeps finding ways to butt in. Trust. That's the ticket. =)

User avatar
Ingen
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:39 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby Ingen » Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:00 am

One piece of advice. For the time being, forget the story that you are enlightened already. Put yesterdays awakenings aside. Take responsibility for seeing truth NOW.
I'm the one reading these lines. That's the simplist thing that comes to mind. And in a funny way very true. Any further labeling, or words or talking about it, describing it, gets us further away from the real me.
You are not looking precisely enough. Break "reading these lines" down to the constituent parts of the reading process. What is present, when reading these lines IN YOUR DIRECT EXPERIENCE.

Is there a you necessary for seeing the screen? Are you doing the seeing? Or is seeing just there. Are you doing understanding, or does understanding without your assistance?

Are thoughts coming up? Is someone thinking these thoughts? Can you find someone or something thinking?

I guess you are saying now: " IknowIknow, 'I' is just a bunch of thoughts." That is not enough. Take them apart, see the mechanism.

Don't agree or disagree with me. Look for yourself.

User avatar
buddhawarrior
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:27 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby buddhawarrior » Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:46 am

I know I know. Yes, that comes up. What are my direct experience in the present. Yes, lots of thoughts. Wanting to have the right answer. Wanting to be liked, loved, right, enlightened. Afraid. Fear. Afraid of being wrong, being told wrong, not knowing, the unknown. These thoughts come too. Doubt is here, am I right? am I enlightened? am I afraid, am I doing it right? pain comes up. Pain in my body, pain my head, pain and suffering. But breath is here too, calmness, peace, compassion for self and understanding. patience for the journey. That's here as well. where do all these thoughts come from? one after another, one thought triggers another and another, each multiplying, sometimes triggering hundreds more, all thoughts, can't escape. I see my hands moving, the curser shift as each letter is added to the page. I hear the fridge, I hear the buzz in my ear. I feel the heat in my spine. I smell the scents in the room, some kind of wood, cypress maybe. Space and emptiness, also here. In my head, a vastness, a void, feels nice and comforting to be in the void. big sigh, eyes tired. lips dry. neck creaks, shoulders drop. Answering questions. That's what I'm doing? why answer? more thoughts, doubts and fears. Is this the right path for me. do I need this? more questions. No-self, that's the question. what is the answer? how to describe to someone who never heard. My direct experience, not some abstract imagery. I find it difficult. who finds it difficult? why is it difficult, what is difficult? try and find the source of "me". Try and find the source of "you". where are you? where is the self? Can I find a self? who thinks these thoughts. Who is typing. He has a name. who has a name? He has a body. who has a body? He's done things and has had influence in this world. who is he? where is he? It's me. Who is that? where is that. Who is the one who knows it's me?

More thoughts. all thoughts. leads no where. Go back to breath. go back to mantra. go back to service. keep moving, keep busy. Who's busy, who's moving? who is giving these suggestions. Out of time, gotta go. get on the road, get home from work. Why? who? the body and mind has places to be things to do, where am I? where is self in all this? can I find him? who is finding who? who suggested to find? the website? the forum, the blog, some mysterious person who responds by the name ingen? should I stop? should I continue? have I typed enough? what do they want to hear me say? who's they? why say anything? my fears of being wrong, or right, where do they come from? childhood? Parents? Persons of authority? Identity? The spankings? I can be hurt physically, mentally, but where is the self? who is the I and where is the I that can be hurt? Want to escape, more doubts, this world is painful. Who is hurt? Stories, more stories. I can write a novel about this person, with a name, a face, a passion, a purpose. But it will not be non-fiction, not really. what is really happening, what is present. I continue to sit and type. continue to look at thoughts, sensations in my body. Wife, I miss her, gotta get home. Baby girl, can't wait to see her. Who misses? who can't wait? thoughts, stories. These are the thoughts that cause good feelings. I like to attach to them. Who likes to attach? Who feels good? The comfort and safety of home. Where is the self? Self is no where. Thoughts, ideas, momentum, kharma, nature, tao, flow, happening, the great IS. who labels? where is the labeler? who needs these teachings? more comfort, more safety, more attachment. who is attached? where is this person? flowing a river of thoughts and making commentary. that's all. who comments, where thoughts from? Am I done typing, should I go on?

The mechanism?

what does this word mean? what do they want me to say? break it down? what does that mean? Break it down? trying to define. searching brain for answer. who is searching? what's in the brain, whose brain? can it be searched by the who???? mechanism? like a car? mechanics? eyes, read, photons, occular receptors, nerve impulses, all learned from class. The experience of seeing? no one is seeing. there is no inside, or outside, a flow. no boundries. More thoughts, more stories, more explainations. Who is explaining? the "enlightened one"? with all the answers? the teacher wanna-be? Thoughts, ideas. Mechanism? 1 - 2 - 3 - steps? a + b = C? logic? who is answering? who is listen? who is quesitoning? where is the self? no solutions come to mind. Doubt follows. Do I know, am I enlightened? will I ever be enlightened? no answer. who asks? who answers? getting dark out side, must leave now.

User avatar
No_One
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:42 am
Location: Romania
Contact:

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby No_One » Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:26 pm

buddhawarrior, what we offer here is help in seeing there is no self. That there is nothing personal about life. That the "personal" I is only a mind product and there is no separate entity. And that is the only purpose of this forum. If you have no interest in that there's no reason for you to be on this forum. So either show us you have seen this already or engage and see it. Your call ...

User avatar
buddhawarrior
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:27 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby buddhawarrior » Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:29 pm

buddhawarrior, what we offer here is help in seeing there is no self. That there is nothing personal about life. That the "personal" I is only a mind product and there is no separate entity. And that is the only purpose of this forum. If you have no interest in that there's no reason for you to be on this forum. So either show us you have seen this already or engage and see it. Your call ...
I am trying my best. Giving it my all. Every answer comes from the sincerity. I'm not sure why this does not translate over the forum.

do you have a question for me no-one? I'm ready and willing.

If I'm assuming that the previous question was calling for more stream of consciousness break down, so I gave it. I tracked my thoughts as they came and wrote them down. Everything, doubts, fears, fraustrations. This is just how I see it. Not trying to DO or BE anything. Just letting my mind run and spilling my guts.

was there something in the previous post you are referring to specifically?

User avatar
Ingen
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:39 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby Ingen » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:31 pm

Look if there is anything all these thoughts appear to. Consider if this could be true: There are just thoughts, nobody is observing. The "observing" is also just a thought.
More thoughts. all thoughts. leads no where. Go back to breath. go back to mantra.
You don't have to try to get into a specific state. We are talking ordinary everyday experience here. Mental chatter is as good as feelings of stillness. Both are happening to ... Are they happening to someone?

User avatar
buddhawarrior
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:27 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby buddhawarrior » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:46 pm

Look if there is anything all these thoughts appear to. Consider if this could be true: There are just thoughts, nobody is observing. The "observing" is also just a thought.
There is no solid thing that observes. I search and search and search, it's just emptiness. But everything that exists, exist, only that there is no identifiable "self" or ego, or "I" or observer. Even writing this is a thought. Even trying to answer these questions are thoughts.
Mental chatter is as good as feelings of stillness. Both are happening to ... Are they happening to someone?
Yes, that is the reminder that comes the hardest. I often hold onto physical feelings of ecstasy and mistaken it for some kind of enlightenment. It is not. All is good, all is God. Good bad ugly, war famine, death, rape, disease, all part of God, all part of nature, all just happening. Any thoughts of it happening to someone, or someone causing it is just more illusion, the ego. Even calling it ego is more ego. This site and this discussion has brought to the front of my thoughts parts of my identity I'm still stuck on, and It's been very freeing to unstuck it.

User avatar
Pratityasamutpada
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:40 pm

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby Pratityasamutpada » Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:15 am

Personally I think your last post on page 4 was awesome.

Not because of what was in it!

But because it shows you were actually observing your experience.

Return to that...



The thing to do then, is to look where all that stuff which comes by, is coming from. Don't ask yourself this question verbally, don't try to answer it to yourself verbally. Only look silently at what comes by, just like you did in that other post, but with an eye out for what creates it in that moment. Not theorizing about causality in time, but observing in that moment as it is passing by.

That has been more or less the question right from the beginning, and it will remain so until you get to a genuine answer. Is there an "I" receiving all that stuff? Is there an "I" sending all that stuff? Is there an "I" watching it all happen? Is there an "I" behind the voice in your head that is reading this post right now? Don't assume anything about the answer, look at what is true in your own experience directly. No rush.

So keep observing as before, but don't bother about the content so much, except insofar as needed to find out where "I" comes into play. Persistence is the key.

User avatar
buddhawarrior
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:27 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Re: Liberation vs neuroscience.

Postby buddhawarrior » Fri Nov 04, 2011 1:18 am

So keep observing as before, but don't bother about the content so much, except insofar as needed to find out where "I" comes into play. Persistence is the key.
look at what is true in your own experience directly
Yes, I see how the "philosopher" the "knower" and all the other very established personal stories and characters have become my identity. And each thought that comes sometimes get caught by these characters and blown up. This site has been super useful so far in helping me see the parts of me that is the most stuck. I see how my ego swells up and tries to defend itself and claim existence. That's a thought too. I appreciate your candor and that of everyone else.

I see how the philosophizing and the theorizing has helped me in the past, it has gotten me to where I am. It helped to make sense of the far-out experiences I had, but now, it's time to let that go as well. Those are just thoughts. Knowing is just a thought. Thinking that i know, so to avoid extra work, strange, how that's just a thought too. Such a large part of my identity for so long. Always thought of myself as "efficient" "effective" "solver of problems." But just thoughts, just false personas. Think of myself as "helper" "nice guy". Just more thoughts.

I am committed to seeing the truth at all times. And with the help of this site, there is a group of people who can help me do that.

Thank you.


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests