Direct Pointing Request

All threads where seeing happens are stored here. The complete list, sorted by guide, contains all links. The archives include threads of those that came to LU already seeing as well.
You are welcome to continue your conversation with your guide here after your name is turned blue.
User avatar
johnr
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:45 pm

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby johnr » Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:35 pm

When you look at things from the point of view of a subject that is separate from objects out there - as we have learned to do since early childhood - then yes, sure, it is an undefined object. But, is this also what direct experience reveals?

When does something become an object... is space an object? Or maybe air, or steam or a cloud? Or maybe a drop of water..? Doesn't it only depend on your concepts that define something as an object that is separate from other objects?

What is required before the process of conceptualisation can label a part of this experience as an object? You need visual perception, right? So... what exactly do you perceive visually?
Do you perceive an object as such or do you ever only perceive colours?

Can you separate the color from the seeing or are they one and the same?
Is there an entity "seer" that is separate from the seeing/color? Is there an object out there that is separate from the seeing/color?

How about the other senses? Isn't this the same for hearing, smelling, tasting and touching/feeling?
Yes, I can see that ingrained concepts create an illusion of perceiver/object separation. An object becomes an object when direct experience is labelled, when there is belief of separation.

The seeing, the objects, the colors all the same. No seer, no separation. I'm starting to get this, but it's very difficult to penetrate the old conceptions. I'm going to spend some time with this today.

I don't normally recall my dreams and I normally don't make an effort to, but the past couple of nights I've been getting some stuff regarding this practice. Just an observation.

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Tue Jan 20, 2015 1:07 am

I don't normally recall my dreams and I normally don't make an effort to, but the past couple of nights I've been getting some stuff regarding this practice.
When you are dreaming.. there is this character that is identified as "I/me", right?
He sees objects, he hears, smells, feels and thinks... He sees objects and touches them - they have a certain texture, they feel heavy, don't they?
Are there "real" objects in a dream? What is the difference between a dream object and a real object? Aren't they both made of the same "thought-stuff"?
The seeing, the objects, the colors all the same. No seer, no separation. I'm starting to get this, but it's very difficult to penetrate the old conceptions.
Do you see this on an intellectual level or do you SEE this in direct experience?
...and by SEEing this I don't mean a mystical experience, but simply looking without believing any concepts about what is being seen...

User avatar
johnr
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:45 pm

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby johnr » Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:07 pm

When you are dreaming.. there is this character that is identified as "I/me", right?
He sees objects, he hears, smells, feels and thinks... He sees objects and touches them - they have a certain texture, they feel heavy, don't they?
Are there "real" objects in a dream? What is the difference between a dream object and a real object? Aren't they both made of the same "thought-stuff"?
So objects are projections of or generated by thought? Or perception is thought-based illusion? That would extend to physical human bodies as well. Maybe I'm missing the point. I'm getting lost here.
Do you see this on an intellectual level or do you SEE this in direct experience?
...and by SEEing this I don't mean a mystical experience, but simply looking without believing any concepts about what is being seen...
Intellectual, with brief flashes of insight. I'm stuck there.

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Wed Jan 21, 2015 1:17 am

So objects are projections of or generated by thought? Or perception is thought-based illusion? That would extend to physical human bodies as well. Maybe I'm missing the point. I'm getting lost here.
Have a look at your direct experience. Do objects exist in pure seeing, hearing, smelling, feeling? Or is "This is a car" always only a descriptive thought, making sense of the experience based on a certain color/shape/sound combination?
In direct experience, is there a difference between "This is a car" and "I see a car". Is the experience itself different or is only the conceptual thought structure a different one? Is there an object or a subject in any part of direct experience besides what thought says about it?

Do thoughts perceive/experience anything or is thought also experienced just like seeing, hearing and smelling are?

User avatar
johnr
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:45 pm

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby johnr » Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:21 pm

Have a look at your direct experience. Do objects exist in pure seeing, hearing, smelling, feeling? Or is "This is a car" always only a descriptive thought, making sense of the experience based on a certain color/shape/sound combination?

In direct experience, is there a difference between "This is a car" and "I see a car". Is the experience itself different or is only the conceptual thought structure a different one? Is there an object or a subject in any part of direct experience besides what thought says about it?
Direct experience is the seeing, smelling, hearing, feeling. No subject, no object, just experiencing. The existence of an object is predicated on separation. But there is no separation. Observation of a car is predicated on evaluative thought.
Do thoughts perceive/experience anything or is thought also experienced just like seeing, hearing and smelling are?
Thoughts do not perceive. They are not sensory.

I've noticed that I'm only able to experience one sense at a time. When seeing I may hear a sound, and I shift to hearing, but I can't seem to be able to see and hear in the same moment.

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:49 pm

I've noticed that I'm only able to experience one sense at a time. When seeing I may hear a sound, and I shift to hearing, but I can't seem to be able to see and hear in the same moment.
Well... that would be disastrous wouldn't it? How do you drive a car?
Maybe what you are saying is that you can only focus on and think about one thing at a time... you think about whatever comes into the focus of your attention. If its interesting enough it might keep you there otherwise thought grasps the next best thing, and if there is no urgent thinking required thinking still happens, but this time its about the past, the future, what should be and what is not... The first kind of thinking is not a bad thing, its actually a great tool. The second kind is mostly completely useless and only takes you away from THIS to thought-world.
Try to notice when the second kind of thinking happens - also try to "widen your focus" of attention. Whenever you focus on, lets say a sound, be also aware of the sensory input from your body etc... see how that works.
Direct experience is the seeing, smelling, hearing, feeling. No subject, no object, just experiencing. The existence of an object is predicated on separation. But there is no separation. Observation of a car is predicated on evaluative thought.
Ok... how does that make you feel?
You write this in a very clear and logical way, but what does this mean for you and for your life - do you think it changes anything?

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:30 am

I've noticed that I'm only able to experience one sense at a time. When seeing I may hear a sound, and I shift to hearing, but I can't seem to be able to see and hear in the same moment.
Well... that would be disastrous wouldn't it? How do you drive a car?
Maybe what you are saying is that you can only focus on and think about one thing at a time... you think about whatever comes into the focus of your attention. If its interesting enough it might keep you there otherwise thought grasps the next best thing, and if there is no urgent thinking required thinking still happens, but this time its about the past, the future, what should be and what is not... The first kind of thinking is not a bad thing, its actually a great tool. The second kind is mostly completely useless and only takes you away from THIS to thought-world.
Try to notice when the second kind of thinking happens - also try to "widen your focus" of attention. Whenever you focus on, lets say a sound, be also aware of the sensory input from your body etc... see how that works.

Focussing on a part of experience works a bit like a flashlight in a dark room, doesn't it? But does this mean that whatever is illuminated by the flashlight is separate from the rest of the room? Is seeing separate from any of the other sense perceptions?
Direct experience is the seeing, smelling, hearing, feeling. No subject, no object, just experiencing. The existence of an object is predicated on separation. But there is no separation. Observation of a car is predicated on evaluative thought.
Ok... how does that make you feel?
You write this in a very clear and logical way, but what does this mean for you and for your life - do you think it changes anything?

User avatar
johnr
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:45 pm

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby johnr » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:49 pm

also try to "widen your focus" of attention. Whenever you focus on, lets say a sound, be also aware of the sensory input from your body etc... see how that works.

Focussing on a part of experience works a bit like a flashlight in a dark room, doesn't it? But does this mean that whatever is illuminated by the flashlight is separate from the rest of the room? Is seeing separate from any of the other sense perceptions?
I explored this and was able to expand my awareness. Not focusing in a way that facilitated sensing multiple inputs seemed tricky, but I was able to do it.

Direct experience is the seeing, smelling, hearing, feeling. No subject, no object, just experiencing. The existence of an object is predicated on separation. But there is no separation. Observation of a car is predicated on evaluative thought.
Ok... how does that make you feel?

You write this in a very clear and logical way, but what does this mean for you and for your life - do you think it changes anything?
It really doesn't seem to change anything other than the relationship with my environment. I'm not observing it, or in it, and it's not around me. There is no it and no me. There just is. It's weird, but not unsettling. It's calming. There's no judgement or evaluation. What is, is. And that's it.

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:26 am

It really doesn't seem to change anything other than the relationship with my environment. I'm not observing it, or in it, and it's not around me. There is no it and no me. There just is. It's weird, but not unsettling. It's calming. There's no judgement or evaluation. What is, is. And that's it.
Great! Well seen!

Do you feel we should explore/probe some more into that? Do you feel any doubt or questions arising?
Do you see that this separate "I/me" ever only was a story, a concept and not a separate entity that lives a life and controls events?

User avatar
johnr
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:45 pm

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby johnr » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:34 am

Do you feel we should explore/probe some more into that? Do you feel any doubt or questions arising?
Do you see that this separate "I/me" ever only was a story, a concept and not a separate entity that lives a life and controls events?
My relationship with food just changed in the blink of an eye. It's like a switch was flipped. Eating when stressed or depressed had become just plain eating out of habit. This morning when I normally would have stopped for something to eat thinking that I might not have the opportunity later, I realized that I wasn't hungry, so I didn't stop, not even for coffee. I ate a small salad around lunch time, and that's pretty much I've had all day. And I'm still not hungry, nor am I itching to stuff something into my face even though it's close to the time I would normally be preparing dinner.

Something happened at work this morning that normally would have mildly upset me. I simply decided there were two ways to deal with it. I picked one, and it was done. No fretting over it, and no questioning the decision in hindsight. I also now see that which choice I picked doesn't even matter.

I feel compelled to probe some more with your guidance even though there really isn't any doubt. It's more like "did that just happen?" and "where I go from here?" because suddenly I feel disinterested in a lot of stuff.

I did sit a number of times today with "who is inquiring about who is looking?" and there is definitely an absence of a who.

Thank you for your dedication to this work, Alex. It is greatly appreciated.

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:55 am

Beautiful! I am happy to keep on exploring THIS with you, but the way you wrote your last post, I think "you got it" - if thats possible at all :-)

What we normally do here at LU, once the separate self has been seen as illusory, is to ask a few final questions and then offer you to join the LU groups on Facebook. At the same time we can also start a new discussion in the Unleashed section of this forum. If this sounds good, then please have a look at these questions. It might also be the case that there are more doubts coming up when answering the questions, which is fine too - we can explore this as well:

1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?

2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.

3) How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.

4) What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?

5) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? What are you responsible for?
Please give examples from recent experience.

6) Anything to add?

User avatar
johnr
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:45 pm

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby johnr » Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:58 pm

Beautiful! I am happy to keep on exploring THIS with you, but the way you wrote your last post, I think "you got it" - if thats possible at all :-)

What we normally do here at LU, once the separate self has been seen as illusory, is to ask a few final questions and then offer you to join the LU groups on Facebook. At the same time we can also start a new discussion in the Unleashed section of this forum. If this sounds good, then please have a look at these questions. It might also be the case that there are more doubts coming up when answering the questions, which is fine too - we can explore this as well:

1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?
No, most definitely not.
2) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.
The self is a fictional mental construct of an autonomous being that believes it perceives, analyzes, manipulates, and to some degree controls and even creates an external environment (and the other separate objects within that environment) in which self operates. Self has a need to be the master of its domain. And when the environment and objects don't function according to plan, the self becomes frustrated. It interprets things and events in terms of good and bad, holy and evil, pleasant and unpleasant, fair and unfair, etc. The self seems to operate primarily from a need to be important or special. That importance or specialness reinforces the perceived separation.

Are we born with it? I'm not sure. I see yours/mine happening at a very young age.

I'm getting an analogy about eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge in the Christian bible. That all of a sudden seems to be about self/no-self.
3) How does it feel to see this? What is the difference from before you started this dialogue? Please report from the past few days.
I'm not getting any mind-blowing revelations about unity, which I suppose if I had anticipated some outcome, that would have been it. What I really notice is the falling away of self-importance. So much just doesn't really seem to matter. I'm content to just allow what is to be what it is, and not attribute meaning to things. There's no need for things to be good or bad, fair or unfair. I really seem to be disinterested in the future, and where there previously would have been an uneasiness with that disinterest, there now is not. I can actually sense the space where that uneasiness would have been. Mental labels now seem silly. Especially the spiritual label. That one is actually hilarious to me. I literally want to laugh out loud about "spiritual." I'm getting an image of people (myself included) immersed in various spiritual practices being like kids playing on a playground. It's fun and harmless, but that seems to be about the extent of it. There most certainly is no "power" in it. There is a perceptible shift that I almost anticipated being gone today when I awoke. But it's still there. A noticable shifting that I can't seem to be able to describe in words. And clinging. I just got that. No more mental or emotional clinging.
4) What was the last bit that pushed you over, made you look?
Many things served to help chip away at it, but I feel that the repeated asking of who is inquiring about who is looking is ultimately what did it. The chipping away weakened the construct enough that eventually the remainder just shattered from the repeated asking.
5) Describe decision, intention, free will, choice and control. What makes things happen? How does it work? What are you responsible for?

Please give examples from recent experience.


Yesterday at work I got a wet spot on my jeans. Wet enough that it was uncomfortable and was going to take quite awhile to dry. Instead of fretting over it I realized that my choice was simply to stay at work with wet jeans or go home and change. I decided to go home and change. I could have worried about what my supervisor might think, or how many hours of work I would miss for the pay period, and previously I would have done that. But the reality of the situation was simply that I could stay and be uncomfortable, or go home. My jeans getting wet and remaining wet were beyond my control. I just got that there really isn't control at all. And after that, just now, I got that control implies a controller, which of course there is none. There does seem to be a subtle difference between decision and choice. Decision involves evaluative thinking. So maybe not so subtle a difference. Choice is just the act of picking. I'm getting that choice is more about spontaneity. Intention has the quality of being purposeful. It's about wanting something to be a certain way, then intending it to be that way. That implies self to me, as does will. Intention and will imply control which implies a controller. Now I'm getting that decision implies a decider and choice implies a chooser. What does that leave? Nothing. There does seem to be something remaining regarding choice, but I'm not able to pin it down. Nothing "makes" things happen. The happening just is. It's organic. There's a quality of cause and effect among "things", but source seems to be an entirely different matter. Sunlight causes evaporation which results in moisture forming in clouds which results in rain falling back to the Earth which puddles on pavement which may cause a vehicle to lose traction, etc. And the water eventually evaporates continuing the cycle. But the isness underlying all of that seems to be the only thing of true substance. The underlying isness is all that really is. I'm going off on a tangent, but that's what I'm getting. What am I responsible for? Nothing. There is no me to be responsible.
6) Anything to add?
This last bit of questioning helped in "getting" that I actually "got it." It feels as if nothing has changed and everything has changed. Awareness is shifting subtly but massively. What does it all mean? Nothing. Hilarious. I just got the cosmic joke.

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Sat Jan 24, 2015 2:10 am

I decided to go home and change. I could have worried about what my supervisor might think, or how many hours of work I would miss for the pay period, and previously I would have done that. But the reality of the situation was simply that I could stay and be uncomfortable, or go home.
It is great that things are getting simpler and flow more easily without fretting over what could or should be done or not be done, but as you mentioned a bit later on, there really is no one to decide or choose, is there?

There seems to be a choice, stay or go home... How does a choice arise? Isn't this simply the case when thought states "OK, I can do either A or B...". What would happen if there is no thought about choice... The pants get wet and you simply get up, walk home, get changed and walk back to work. That's it. Done. Was there a choice?
When you drive a car (or basically do anything at all) - have a look at how many apparent decisions are made that you never even consider. Out of 1000 things that happen, that could have happened in another way if conditions would have been different, how many do you think become apparent to thought - where thought then comes up with "I can choose between A and B"...

Lets make one step back. There is the experience of "wet jeans". A thought comes up "it is uncomfortable - I should do something to fix that". Based on the situation certain options arise as thought "1: Go home and change", "2: Stay and endure", "3: Go out and buy a hairdryer", "4: Buy a new pair of jeans".... Finally one of the options is chosen... How does this exactly happen? There is no entity that decides which option to choose, right? So one of them - or maybe even another option that has not been thought of - will be acted out. Based on what? What is there that tips the scale to 1, 2, 3 or 4? Is there anything else but the current situation, this moment (which also involves all the conditioning that has been built up over years)?

Have a look at how choice seems to come up (or not) and decisions are made throughout your day and please report back on what you find.

User avatar
johnr
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:45 pm

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby johnr » Sun Jan 25, 2015 12:26 am

Have a look at how choice seems to come up (or not) and decisions are made throughout your day and please report back on what you find.
On observation and examination it is really about doing and not so much about choosing. And to clarify, it's not a self doing, but being the doing. There is a flow. To break everything down into choice would be maddening, as there are infinite choices. Typing for example. Choosing each keystroke. Which finger to press which key. Or to press each key with which of an infinite number of objects other than a finger. When to press each key, as in how much time between keystrokes. How much pressure to apply to the key. I did notice an image actually came up once which I've never noticed before. It had to do with which shirt to wear outdoors when I noticed in the mirror the shirt I was wearing was dirty. There was a consideration of appropriate clothing for the weather, but it seemed to be more about noticing than about thinking. I got an image of a heavy thermal shirt that was suitable for weather not cold enough for a jacket. I wasn't thinking about options or looking at shirts. I was standing in front of the mirror brushing my teeth. I noticed the dirty shirt, I knew what the weather was, and the image of the shirt appeared. In most things it seems that thought only serves to complicate choice. It creates space for more thought to occur and thought spawns thought spawns more thought. While attention is on thought there is no choosing or doing. What I got most out of this exercise was noticing the flow of the doing.

User avatar
Alexw
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:50 am

Re: Direct Pointing Request

Postby Alexw » Sun Jan 25, 2015 2:47 am

I don't have much time today to answer. I will be back tomorrow. Have a great Sunday!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Return to “ARCHIVES”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 14 guests