Nope. Just itself haha

Thanks so much! The peace has been here all along :)

1) There is the illusion of a self. A separate entity that has autonomous control over his or her own actions, but it is merely an illusion. Kind of like how optical illusions work. They appear as one thing, but are completely different from what ...

Or no one rather...could say god, or source..but even then that seems like saying there is an entity there...It's just nothingness experiencing itself through "apparent" form.

Nothing :) hahahahaha

No, there isn't even such a thing as inside/ outside in DE. I can't describe " this". It can only be experience itself to know.

Can the mind do anything in DE? Can one thought know another thought? is there any locus that drives this in DE?



Same as above... and is any effort required for DE?

Confused about that first question. The mind can only describe nothing more...it does so automatically. Like...as if it had a ...

No...nothing just this DE...any speculation would be a reference to thought..

It's funny because there's an understanding that all seeking is an attempt of the mind to get out of its DE into a better moment. That moment never arrives but it "appears" to arrive through pleasure...but that comes and ...

No!!! There are no reference points!

LOL what a funny question there's no free will because it's all just happening freely. An appearance of control but none whatsoever. Neuroscience and quantum physics even show this. Omg! It's so simple no wonder the mind overlooks it!

LOL of course! The description tries to know (mind, me, self, thoughts) but it will never know 'me' or this. Or god, source whatever we call it. All there is is knowing lmao hahahaha. There is knowing, experiencing knowing everything and nothing and in this knowing appears description trying to know ...

It's hard to put into words. There is nothing really. Things appear but there are no beliefs that the body, or the chair, or the chair are really as they are. Only empty words or sounds pointing to a thing...but the description can't truly explain what it is.

I had to step out of mind for this...because I kept going back to what the mind had heard. In this DE i am that which experiences itself in the apparent form of a body and mind but I am not that.

No, the description of the experience arises in the experience but it's not separate from the experience..

OMG!!!its the description of the experience (self) that is believing itself to be separate from the experience!!

No...Just experience...and description...there doesn't seem to be a separate thing who knows this...I don't really know..there's less and less to say.

lol...i can't describe it. There is just seeing...images..forms and then there isn't. Appearances and then the disappearance of those images.