"Does any iota of Omar remain identified with?"
No, 'Omar' is just a label for ever-changing thoughts.
"When you mention 'mind' what are you referring to exactly?
Thoughts actually
Is there an owner of a mind? (You?)
No, there is no owner because the mind is only a thought of something that ...

4) Explain in detail what the illusion of separate self is, when it starts and how it works from your own experience. Describe it fully as you see it now.
The illusion of a separate self is the false belief that 'I' (mind and body) am an inherent entity that exists detached from the direct ...

1) Is there a separate entity 'self', 'me' 'I', at all, anywhere, in any way, shape or form? Was there ever?
No, there is no separate 'self' and there never was one.
2) How does it feel to see this?
Physically, there is a slight tingling and buoyant energy around the heart. There is also a sense ...

Could peace be obtained by simply realising that one's true nature is beyond knowledge?
Yes, the peace of realizing that there is no separate self is not dependent on knowledge of true nature.
but I want you to be clear at this point that you are certain there is no inherently existing 'self' or ...

Would this not equate to some form of determinism, an absence of free-will?
Actually, realization of no separate self would nullify the concepts of determinism / absence of free-will because there is no 'I' that has a fate that is pre-determined and there is no 'I' that does not have the ability ...

It is evident when it is realised that there is no separate self that could realise anything.
Ok, this is understood.
What loses awareness of a realisation? What is having these 'I' thoughts? What could 'become more aware of no-self'? Nothing, to all the above.
So what can be done? See that 'I ...

Other things to examine may be 'other people'
Yes, there is also a sense of apprehension using terms such as 'you', 'they'.
To put it in a more general sense . . . If a thought appears questioning the validity of anything . . . what has it got to do with you?
How is it evident that no separate ...

How are things now?
No perception shifts per se... but there is Increased awareness of no separate self.
Do you have any questions at this point?
Is there anything else to examine?
Is it realised that 'I' is only (to try to use your words) just a label - A conditioned response?
At the same ...

Was there any choice in coming here for guidance?
No, there was no individual 'self' that decided to receive guidance.
Was there an inherently existing separate self ('I') doing any of the inquiries that were asked? Ever?
No, the inquiries just appear. Any assumptions of a separate self doing ...

Inquire - In the experience of creating that thought can an 'I' be found that created it? Can an 'I' be found that witnessed it?
There is no "I" found in the creation or witnessing of the thought.
Is there an 'I' to be found in the experience that is capable of controlling thoughts? (If there was ...

Is it realised that in the experience of all the senses, that 'I' is only ever a label. It is not something can be found actively performing any of the senses?
Yes
In the experience itself of 'choosing' what is making the decision? Is there an 'I' to be found making the choice? Can whatever is ...

Ok, the framework is understood. 'I' = body/mind
So if it said 'I am feeling', what is the 'I'?
'I' is a only a thought.
Is it assumed that the 'I' (specifically the body) is responsible for the sense of touch.
No, there is nothing specifically responsible for the sense of touch.
Is it an ...

Does this seem fair?
Yes, I agree.
In the experience itself, how many things are there? Are there two things?
No, there is only the sensation. An 'I' cannot be found, in the experience.
Is the body doing it?
In the experience, there is nothing that can be found doing the feeling.
...what is ...

Hi Xian,

Thank you for your patience guidance. Yes, I would like to continue.

Do you understand that perception itself is based on thought (memory)?
When I say 'thought', I am not referring to a thought object but on the automatic labelling performed by the conscious process. This is going far ...

Reading between the lines, you appear to be referring to 'Direct Experience' as some-sort of altered state of consciousness where the objectifying mind is not present (thoughts not present during experience).
Is that right?
Currently, I see the totality of life experience as a combination of ...