yes, thats it. Its all ok. Its about seeing this. Seeing that thought divide the world up into 'objects'. Is it like this?A. yes, I see that I am categorising and dividing the world up into 'objects'...
Thats the question. Can we realy know from AE that there is an object , a thing somewhere out there, that is labled (=thought)? Or are there sensation + colour/image + sound + smell +taste and thought "build" objects out of it and give lables?For practical reasons we give things names. But that implies that there are things to name. I look and in AE there is colour, texture, movement, sound, shape, smell - the mind labels it all. Without the mind it is just those elements being experienced directly
to the world? a separation between you and the world? Or an intimacy with all experience, with all that is?lso, in AE things aren't 'arising in awareness' - that makes it sound like they suddenly pop up from somewhere else. In AE there is an immediacy and an intimacy to the world,
are you using "things" a a synonym of "objects" ? ;-)thought separates 'me' from 'it' and makes things 'other'. In AE nothing is 'other' things simply are, here and now.
or is it "experience simply is, here and now" - does it make a difference for you? Or is it same?
Can you seperate both?They are connected, but I wonder if experience is the arising of sensations, feelings, thoughts within the field of awareness...