Please read my questions very carefully, and then LOOK very thoroughly.
And I'll phrase my answers more carefully.
“I see it [body] and I sense it” – what is it exactly that is seeing the body?
What is it exactly that is sensing/feeling the body?
That what is seeing and feeling is not and cannot be found, as we repeatedly asserted. So let this be phrased "a body is being seen and felt" or, more accurately, "there is images and sensations", overlaid with thought content that calls and actually makes all this a "body". This itself is not just a thought story, because it is experienced: image+label=item, order, archive, story.
Where is the seer? – find the location
Are there 2 things, a seer + a body being seen?
(Seemingly there are, in thought, which we are not interested in.)
There is only a body being seen, hence the answer is one, not two. Again, to be accurate, there is not a body being seen, but only images that thought content translates into "body" and everything that comes with it.
Where is the feeler? – find the location
Are there 2 things, a feeler + body being felt?
Same experience, same answer" there is only body being felt, no actual evidence of 'a feeler'. Again, not a body but sensations that thought content associates with bodily sensations.
“I assume it is my body because it is always there when I look” – what is it that is looking at the body?
Where is the looker?
That assumption is thought. AE, as stated, is that there is merely seeing (a body), and no looker to be found. There is also AE of thought, and that thought has content that creates the misperception about there being a looker and a body.
Are there 2 things there, a looker + the body being looked at?
No, as asserted, there is not even one, but zero.
Please take a piece of cheese or any food you like in front of you.
It's a small piece of unsweetened liquorice this time.
What is it exactly that is seeing the cheese?
Can a seer be found in experience?
There are images of a black pea-sized thing, which could not be named if it wasn't for labeling thoughts. Again, a seer cannot be found.
Now smell it.
Can a smeller be found in experience, or there is only the smell?
Unlike cheese, there is no distinguishable smell. And there is no smeller, with or without smell.
Now start eating it.
Can a taster be found in experience, or there is only the taste?
There is taste but no taster in experience. There are thoughts too.
So are you saying that YOU ARE the experience of everything else?
Where is the I/YOU that is surrounded by thoughts?
I AM NOT, since I cannot be found, and there just is such experience.
This reply is a thought story, it’s not coming from looking at experience.
Indeed, I see that there is no AE of lack of or no AE.
What is the AE of a space? Is it a sound, color, taste, smell, sensation or thought?
Indeed, it is none of these.
What is the AE of a backdrop? Is it a sound, color, taste, smell, sensation or thought?
How is it known EXACTLY that experience occurs against a ‘backdrop’?
Is there an ACTUAL experience of experience happening against a ‘backdrop’ or a ‘space’ at all, or only thoughts suggest so?
Only thoughts suggest so. There is no experience whatsoever outside experience, if I may put it that way.